Watch Kamala's "60 Minutes" interview here and see why Trump wants to say it was incoherent and illegal, by Hal M. Brown, MSW

 

Click to watch interview.

Perhaps the biggest news about this is that Trump actually watched the Kamala Harris "60 Minutes" interview.

Why else are we seeing stories about his reaction like this?

This is what he posted on Truth Social.

I’ve never seen this before, but the producers of 60 Minutes sliced and diced (“cut and pasted”) Lyin’ Kamala’s answers to questions, which were virtually incoherent, over and over again, some by as many as four times in a single sentence or thought, all in an effort, possibly illegal as part of the “News Division,” which must be licensed, to make her look “more Presidential,” or a least, better. It may also be a major Campaign Finance Violation. This is a stain on the reputation of 60 Minutes that is not recoverable - It will always remain with this once storied brand. I have never heard of such a thing being done in “News.” It is the very definition of FAKE NEWS! The public is owed a MAJOR AND IMMEDIATE APOLOGY! This is an open and shut case, and must be investigated, starting today!

Note that this was posted at 4:16 AM.

I missed watching the interview when it was broadcast but thanks to RawStory I easily found the link to the YouTube. From RawStory:

It is difficult to understand what the former president is talking about given that the full interview is available on YouTube and Harris speaks cogently over long periods of time without any apparent edits.

I can imagine Trump fulminating for hours after watching the interview until before dawn he came up with a way to attack Kamala's performance. If anyone ever writes a book about his classic outrageous delusional Truth Social posts this should be near the top of the list.

Nobody is going to hold Trump's feet to the fire and demand he give one example of an incoherent sentence which he accuses her of doing in what any English teacher would call an incoherent run-on sentence:

I’ve never seen this before, but the producers of 60 Minutes sliced and diced (“cut and pasted”) Lyin’ Kamala’s answers to questions, which were virtually incoherent, over and over again, some by as many as four times in a single sentence or thought, all in an effort, possibly illegal as part of the “News Division,” which must be licensed, to make her look “more Presidential,” or a least, better.

He accuses her of being incoherent four times!

I wonder whether Trump has a mini-Trump on his shoulder trying to get through to him with the truth telling him that Kamala did a far better job in the interview than he ever could do.

Image by Perchance Photo AI

I doubt it. On a 1-10 scale of how consciously self-aware and self-critical a person is Trump wouldn't even rate a 1. However, Trump is like every other human being, and it is my expert opinion that while he considers himself to have the best genes and the biggest brain there's no such species of Homo superior-sapiens. All people are Homo sapiens and all have an unconscious mind. Somewhere buried in Trump's unconscious are feelings of inferiority that he has spent his entire adult life compensating for.

Trump can't stand to see incontrovertible evidence that he is being bested by an opponent, and by a woman at that. He has convinced himself that he is the exemplar of masculinity who women should worship.

Yesterday's blog:

Other recent blogs:

If Trump ends up going to trial and is convicted is he capable of saying he's sorry?

Will the drip-drip-drip of Trump being Trump overflow his bucket and ruin his chance of winning?

It can’t happen here. Some people “get it” and want it. Some people don’t “get it”, don’t want it, and may vote for it. 

“On the initiative of the vice president” should be on the top of the page story today.

Read other previous blogs here.