Showing posts with label Police State. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Police State. Show all posts

October 28, 2025

Half the nation is okay, blasé, or in favor of a police state, but what could eventually liberate us from totalitarianism? Could it be a military "hell no we won't go?"by Hal M. Brown


 

Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.

If you watched Rachel Maddow last night (watch it here) you saw her opening segment about how Trump has a new tool to implement a supercharged Nazi-like police state that even George Orwell hadn’t imagined for Big Brother. She described what the spyware that the government has purchased, which is called Paragon, can do. This is from Wikipedia:

It’s worth going to Wiki again for a detailed explanation of a police state:

police state is a state whose government institutions exercise an extreme level of control over civil society and liberties. There is typically little to no distinction between the law and the exercise of political power by the executive, and the deployment of internal security and police forces play a heightened role in governance. A police state is a characteristic of authoritarian, totalitarian or illiberal regimes (contrary to a liberal democratic regime). Such governments are not exclusive to simply one-party states or dominant-party states, as they can also arise in a democracy or multi-party system.

Originally, a police state was a state regulated by a civil administration, but since the beginning of the 20th century it has “taken on an emotional and derogatory meaning” by describing an undesirable state of living characterized by the overbearing presence of civil authorities. The inhabitants of a police state may experience restrictions on their mobility, or on their freedom to express or communicate political or other views, which are subject to police monitoring or enforcement. Political control may be exerted by means of a secret police force that operates outside the boundaries normally imposed by a constitutional state.Robert von Mohl, who first introduced the rule of law to German jurisprudence, contrasted the Rechtsstaat (”legal” or “constitutional” state) with the anti-aristocratic Polizeistaat(”police state”).

We also have stories like this:

Unfortunately the word “police” (which you see in the photo above) for the ordinary citizen doesn’t instill the fear it should unless they are hard core felons, or even minor lawbreakers who blow through a red light or speed and their heart races when they see the blue lights strobbing on top of the car behind them.

Trump’s armed thugs do a disservice to real police by having the word on their clothing. Real police are supposed to protect, serve, and to protect people from criminals.

Even the term “secret police” doesn’t lead to terror for those who root for the James Bond types in spy stories. 

This is the kind of secret police that Trump wants for the country:

He also wants to expand what he already has on the streets terrorizing people with all the armed thugs that comprise his anti-immigrant army. It used to be called ICE, but doesn’t currently have a name. It is the force that combines armed agents from Border Patrol, the FBI, ATF, Homeland Security, and even the IRS. They aren’t at all “secret” like the often dapperly dressed 007, but they don’t have uniforms like the Nazi SS.

Trump’s SS wears a hodgepodge of outfits, often with jeans or kakki pants, and some kind of weapon festooned bulletproof vest on top. The frequently wear a mask which not only hides their identities but makes them look more intimidating, as if that’s needed what with all the weapons they carry and their reputation for brutality.

These storm troopers are anything but secret. They come in with a bang, sometimes literally with the explosions of tear gas canisters, and they do their dirty work sometimes shooting people with non-lethal weapons or beating them, and then dragging some of them off to be at the mercy of another group of psychopaths who think they are doing God’s work.

They are not. Only about 50% are feeling various levels of concern, from terror to being blasé. 

Some, like me, see our democracy, and myself, about to drown caught in a whirlpool from which there’s no rescue, no life preserver that can be thrown to save us. 

Others hold out hope coming from the courts or the Democrats winning control of Congress in the next election. I think Trumpism can be slowed down but I don’t see how it can be stopped through the normal democratic proccess.

I have a fleeting sense of hope that there will be a proverbial red line which Trump will cross, probably a confluence of circumtances, which will lead to a decidedly undemocratic resolution. This could eventually restore democracy. It would involve the military saying a very hard “hell no we won’t go” when ordered to turn against American citizens. 

If this happens the numbers would have to be exponentially greater than the two soldiers described in this story:

I asked in my title what could liberate us from totalitarianism. It took a concerted effort by the Allies to save the world from the Axis powers. This culminated with D-Day and ended with Hiroshima and Nagasaki. We don’t have that kind of time. I desperately hope that our liberation is non-violent. Perhaps it could be achieved with the “hell no, we won’t go” I used AI to illustrate in this Substack.

I just looked at Sabrina Haake’s Facebook page where she wrote about Democracy.IO:

This is an incredible free resource. It makes it easy to contact your senators and representatives, all you do is enter your address and it populates the email addresses to Congress assigned to your location. A screen pops up, you write your message and it sends it to your elected representatives.

it came from someone urging dems to thank their representatives for fighting back on the budget, and for holding their ground to pressure the republicans not to throw 12 million people off their health insurance plan. 

She included this link:

My reply, alas, may look overly pessimsitc to some though obviously I think it is realistic. This is what I wrote:

I am afraid that this is a feel-good excercise. Our Democratic Party members of Congress aready know how we feel. If we have Republican members they don’t care. I might say I hate to throw cold water on optimism, but that would be a lie. I am quite deliberate in doing this. I regret doing it. I feel like I am still a psychotherapist working with clients clinging to wishful thinking or false hopes and trying to figure out how to get through to them in ways that will help them cope with inevitable bad outcomes. My Substack today was prompted by Rachel’s show last night. It was about the government use of spyware. I see this as just one way they are well on their way to establishing a police state. I do see hope for a rescue, but it would be drastic and I am no way sure it will happen.

I refuse to be like this, hiding my head ad my feelings in a happy smile Amazon envelop…

… when I really feel like this:

For those with sharp eyes the sign in the background is from a famous Paul Krasner poster from The Realist. Read about it here.

Thanks for reading Hal Brown's Substack! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work not by sending money, just by subscribing and reading what I post.

Leave a comment

Previous Substacks

Share Hal Brown's Substack

My comments in RawStory

RawStory: go-to site for breaking news.

My RawStory comments

Portland Media:

KOIN

KGW

OPB

KATU (Sinclair)








August 11, 2025

Trump's song was "It's My Party and I'll Do What I want To." Now it's "It's my Country and I'll Do What I want to."

 



Leslie Gore’s 1963 hit, “It’s My Party,” was a lament:

It's my party, and I'll cry if I want to
Cry if I want to, cry if I want to
You would cry too if it happened to you

Nobody knows where my Johnny has gone
Judy left the same time
Why was he holding her hand
When he's supposed to be mine?

It's my party, and I'll cry if I want to
Cry if I want to, cry if I want to
You would cry too if it happened to you…

Trump’s version is anything but a sad song. Not for him, it isn’t. It is a victory ballad. Once upon a time, he could spaz dance to the original version about “merely” owning the Republican Party lock, stock and fucken smoking barrel. Now he all but owns the country.

Trump doesn’t have the gene for crying. In it’s place may be the sadism gene which produces visceral pleasure when he’s able to assert his dominance by inflicting pain on others. It’s a true hard-on for him if he can make his enemies writhe in pain, but just being able to make anybody suffer gives him pleasure. The head of the IRS, for example, wasn’t really an enemy until he didn’t obey without question. Laura Loomer can tell him he needs to get rid of someone and I doubt he even looks into whether they’re really an enemy. He just does it because he can. 

Rewarding those who bow down to him orgasmicly. Punishing those who cross him is an earthshaking O.

Every day we wonder what fresh pile of stinking steaming sulfurous vapor will issue forth from the hell from he has unleashed, whether upon the country or the world.

Today, or at least this week, he may do a twofer. He may sell out Ukraine to Russia, and at no addtional cost except to the victims, he may sell out homeless people and home rule in Washington, D.C.

UPDATE:

I doubt Trump ever reads HUFFPOST, but if he did, he’d salivate over main page headlines like this:

Trump has more legal cover for doing this in DC (see What Trump can — and can’t — do in his bid to take over law enforcement in DC. Even so, there is no doubt it is a test of how far he can go. The next step would be to hype up another lie in order to declare martial law nationwide. That would ostensibly give him justifaction for using the military anywhere. It would be a test as to whether there are enough true patriots in the armed forces to allow it to happen. If there are enough of them who say enough is enough, we are looking at the possibility of a soft coup or a classical coup d'état.

P.S.

The DOJ is launching an investigation of Leticia James and Adam Schiff today, too. For certain, it’s a great day in the morning for Donald J. Trump, the preeminent sadist of our time.

Addendum:

I’m not going to explore this here, but it is a relevant question to consider whether or not Trump has a a rage, or anger addiction. People with this are sometimes called “angerholics.” There are numerous articles about this (here).

For all his victories, Trump still can’t resist venting his spleen, or whatever organ, at enemies. For example this story:

Excerpt:

After midnight Monday — and seemingly out of nowhere — Donald Trump lashed out at the New York Times with a claim the venerable paper should be sued by people who chose to stay out of the stock market since 2016 because of the newspaper — and a former columnist's influence.

The president began by focusing his ire on Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman, apparently unaware that the columnist left the Times several months ago. Krugman wrote at the time on The Contrarian, "If you check out my Substack, you will see that I have by no means run out of energy or topics to write about. But from my perspective, the nature of my relationship with the Times had degenerated to a point where I couldn’t stay."

Regardless of the widely publicized departureTrump took to Truth Social in the early hours of Monday to write, "Paul Krugman of the New York Times has been predicting Doom and Gloom ever since my great election success in 2016. In other words, he has been wrong for YEARS, as ALL markets have been hitting new HIGHS, and are now higher than ever before."

This is just a small story compared to what else is going on, howver we deserve something to wish for:

Here’s another article, this by Michael Cohen, about the vice president: “JD Vance Makes Dumb Look Strategic.”

On an unrelated matter, those who are regular readers know I have been permanently suspended from Facebook. (Here’s my Substack about this.) I can’t post links to my Substacks there, nor can I even read it. Mark Zuckerberg, who owns it, has pissed off his neighbors. In the mold of Trump, I am sure he doesn’t care, and he probably enjoys that he has the power to do this. Read: How Mark Zuckerberg upended a quiet California neighborhood to maintain his own private paradise.

Recommended reading:

My comment was simply that I think it is too late to do what Thom Hartmann suggest.

Click for recent posts.

Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.

This post is public so feel free to share it.

Share

Leave a comment

Yesterday's Substack.

Thanksgiving wishes from Hal M. Brown. One of mine came true. I doubt that the Blame the Shooting on Biden strategy will work.

  Yesterday the shooting in DC was all over the media, this morning Thanksgiving parades were major stories until the press conference with ...