August 3, 2024

Media Matters called Fox News anchors Martha MacCallum and Bret Baier major vectors of misinformation. Trump wants them as debate moderators. What's Kamala's best move now? By Hal Brown, MSW

AI Image

Trump wants two particular Fox News hosts to moderate the debate he says he will engage in with Kamala Harris. We don't know if she will accept this. Her most recent response is as follows:


Perhaps Harris should rethink her decision on this but insist on some changes. 

Trump says he is willing to debate Kamala Harris, but only on Fox News and with Martha MacCallun and Bret Baier as moderators. Here's what he posted on Truth Social:

I have agreed with FoxNews to debate Kamala Harris on Wednesday, September 4th. The Debate was previously scheduled against Sleepy Joe Biden on ABC, but has been terminated in that Biden will no longer be a participant, and I am in litigation against ABC Network and George Slopadopoulos, thereby creating a conflict of interest. The FoxNews Debate will be held in the Great Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, at a site in an area to be determined. The Moderators of the Debate will be Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum, and the Rules will be similar to the Rules of my Debate with Sleepy Joe, who has been treated horribly by his Party – BUT WITH A FULL ARENA AUDIENCE!….

I did a web search on whether these two hosts were considered biased. There are many articles about this but the one shown below provides a good summary of the analysis offered in the other articles.

Fox News anchors Martha MacCallum and Bret Baier are major vectors of misinformation

The article begins:

Though framed by Fox as “straight news” anchors, Fox News anchors Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum have allowed misinformation and conspiracy theories to spread on their shows for years. They were both involved in boosting Donald Trump’s lies about the 2020 election, and Baier in particular allowed guests to spew false claims about the election on the air despite privately admitting that there was no foul play or fraud behind the results.

I assume that Kamala Harris will accept this offer although she might demand that since Trump has selected two of the Fox News moderators it is only fair that she select one of them. I thought that among the stable of Fox News hosts there had to be a least biased one.


The article listed Geraldo Rivera as the least despicable. 



John Roberts (above) was second. This is what Slate said about him:

John Roberts. The network’s former White House correspondent was bumped up to a hosting role this year, apparently because Fox executives decided that Steve Doocy’s handsome tall son Peter would be better at asking trollish and irrelevant questions during Biden administration press briefings. Roberts is an actual reporter whose resume includes long stints at CBS and CNN, and he occasionally got very frustrated at the evasive maneuvering of the Trump administration. Roberts has gravitas, perspective, and credibility, and to my mind he is the clear and obvious choice to fill Wallace’s chair. The fact that he would work well in the role is probably exactly why he won’t get it.

I think that too much is made of the influence moderators have on how debates go. The candidates can, and often have, ignored their questions and in the case of Trump their often feeble attempts at fact checking. If Kamala is asked an attempt at a gotcha question based on a lie or distortion she can quickly call it out as such and then take the rest of her time to address Trump's prior response or another subject.

Harris is not there to debate the moderators and she might have to make that clear in no uncertain terms.

Trump demanded what he called "a full arena audience" in the only all caps part of his post. This shows how important he thinks this is. What he means by an arena would have to be defined. 

If it is any larger than the venues used for other debates Kamala can poo-poo this and accept the demand as long as the audience can include an equal number of supporters for both sides and strictly enforced rules against vocal responses during the debate. If the moderators can't control these they should make sure that the time lost was deducted from that person's next chance to speak. 

Prior to the debate no doubt Trump will be hearing a lot about Kamala's career as a prosecutor. He won't be reading articles like this where she was called a ruthless cop, but there's a good chance he will see ads where her record prosecuting criminals like him is touted as they will air on Fox News.

Trump, being Trump, will think he can easily take her on despite this but like everyone he has an unconscious. This will result in dangerous overconfidence and leave him vulnerable to letting his guard down so she can exploit his weaknesses. As successful proecutors do, she can set a trap which a cocky criminal walks right into.

Trump likes to quote cannibal Hannibal Lector saying he was going to have a friend for dinner. Trump is certainly no friend of Kamala Harris, but I think she's the one who is going to have him for dinner if or when she debates him.





 

August 1, 2024

Trump must be screaming since Biden suceeded in getting the prisoners back from Russia. Now he has to get Mexico to help build the wall. By Hal Brown, MSW

 

 
There are numerous photos of Trump yelling but I had to use AI to make an image of how he must be feeling now that Biden has upstaged him by getting the prisioners back from Russia.

(Update) If he watched MSNBC this morning this is what he would have seen:



Trump has to be in ketchup thowing mode when he turns on Fox News and see the major coverage devoted to this news.

Trump can't be happy watching Kamela steal his thunder on Fox and MSNBC:


On top of this, what if Biden and Harris could get Mexico to help pay for the wall?

It there's one more thing that Biden can achieve through diplomacy before the election that would cause Trump to blow a gasket and undermine one of his major talking points it would be to achieve a major solution to the border crisis. This doesn't mean he would actually get Mexico to pay for building the wall although if he could get them to go halfsies on improving the wall it would be compelling optics. He could also sign a major agreement on working to solve the in-country problems that lead people to want to leave. This is where all or most of the immigrants come from. 

If Biden could complete a significant accomplishment to remedy the border crisis it would take take some of the hot air out of Trump's rant about how Kamala Harris, the so-called Border Czar, wants open borders to let in the worst of the worst it would do a lot to knock some of the pins out from under him.



As great a political one-two punch as this would be, I don't know if it is  possible. It might depend on how afraid the countries involved are of a Trump presidency. If the leaders of Mexico and some of the top countires whose citizens are trying to cross our border believe that they will fare better under a President Harris than a President Trump they might be incentivized to ink a deal before our election.


Read previous blogs here.


What a president/dictator Trump could do on day one and thereafter. By Hal Brown, MSW


Trump at the National Association of Black Journalists Conference, above left at the start, below at the end raising his fist defiantly to a decidely anti-Trump group. Was Putin watching?

Trump now famously said he'd only be a dictator on day one. (You can read more about the dictator comments here.)

Thoughts about what Trump could do if elected were literally keeping me from falling back asleep when I woke up at 2:00AM. I started to write this at 3 AM afer thinking about it for an hour and not being able to fall back asleep. It is about the horror of what the maniacal vengeful Trump I saw when he was interviewed yesterday by the Black journalists could do if elected president. What triggered my anxiety over this was watching how unhinged and downright vicious Trump was in that interview.

This is a flight of frightful fantasy. I doubt it would happen. However, it could happen.

Trump wouldn't have to do the comparatively minor things he said he'd do as a dictator on just day one. He said he would close the border and drill, drill, drill. These were the two he mentioned. What else crossed his mind at the time we may never know. I suspect he knew he couldn't say what he'd really do.

What Trump actually said about this is irrelevant because once he is sworn in as president he has the power to do much, much more. In fact, he can exercise incredible power day one, on day two, when he said he'd "merely" stop the electric car mandate, and thereafter. Again, this is just what he said. It isn't what he is planning to do.

What would make sense for him on day one would be to make his first official duty to make himself permanent dictator would be to declare a national emergency. He would say it was to use the military using deadly force if necessary to quell the unrest across the country caused by his election. I have little doubt that there would be protests. This would be especially likely if the election was close and there were indications that the Republicans, like they accused the Democrats of doing, actually did steal the election .

It is quite possible that protests would have included some violence so this would gin up MAGA support for the action. Of course the Supreme Court ruled that he could never be held accountable for this once he's no longer president. That ruling, as much as it shreds the Constitution seperation of powers, is irrelevant to a dictator who rules for life.

Let's consider what this would enable him to do. The following is from a  US News and World Report article:

First order of business is to declare a national emergency. What, then, is a national emergency?

A national emergency is a national crisis or a situation where circumstances threaten the country and call for an immediate response. What actually constitutes an emergency, though, is up for debate and requires the president to use existing law to justify a declaration. Presidents in recent history have exercised their power to declare national emergencies under the National Emergencies Act of 1976. President Gerald Ford signed the act into law on Sept. 14, 1976, to formalize the emergency powers of the president, as well as create checks and balances for that power through Congress. 

What does the NEA mean for the president and Congress?

The act allows the executive branch to declare a national emergency, but the president must cite the specific emergency powers he is activating to make the declaration under existing statutes. There are hundreds of provisions of federal law that delegate the president "extraordinary authority in time of national emergency," according to the Congressional Research Service. The 2007 CRS report notes, "the vast majority of them are of the stand-by kind — dormant until activated by the President." 

Consider just one portion of this:

According to the report: "Under the powers delegated by such statutes, the President may seize property, organize and control the means of production, seize commodities, assign military forces abroad, institute martial law, seize and control all transportation and communication, regulate the operation of private enterprise, restrict travel, and, in a variety of ways, control the lives of United States citizens."

This is the nightmare scenario. A nightmare is a frightening dream. It isn't real. Nightmares come from the unconscious but they are frequently based on real life fears. Sometimes the fears come true. Sometimes they don't. With this in mind I offer something of a waking nightmare of what could happen if Trump wins.

Before he got to controlling people like us Trump could, for example, order all of his enemies arrested including Kamala Harris, her running mate, and Joe Biden, in addtion to Democratic members of Congress, and members of the media. He could do the same with the judges and prosecutors who went after him. He could use both the FBI and the military for this. In fact he could have given groups of local militias arrest power.

Concurrent with these direct acts against people would be taking total control of as much media as possible. This would mean replacing all television, radio, and internet (as much as this is technically possible. I'd expect more and more people would figure out how to use the dark web) with MAGA controlled media. Tucker Carlson could be the media czar.

Whatever statutes, The Posse Comitatus Act comes to mind, which would limit the use of the military for domestic purposes would be ignored.

Trump would have readied the control of the military in advance with his 2025 team to assure he could fire all the top generals and have them replaced with those loyal to him. Welcone back, General Flynn.  

He would have made certain that the National Guard could be federalized. His 2025 advisors would have secretly planned all of this for him.

Then he'd deploy active duty military where he thought it most necessesary. This would not be to the southern border since he really doesn't care about that, it being a campaign ploy to scare people into voting for him.  In fact, he might want to stop people from crossing the northern border since those who was to mount an anti-MAGA resistance may want to flee to Canada. Trump would use the military and federal law enforcement like the FBI and US Marshals to make sure there isn't active resistance against him. It might be to the streets of Washington and cities like Portland and Seattle. Wherever protests erupted they would be met by a swift and ruthless response.

This is what Trump would want to happen. Whether he could pull it off would remain to be seen. To succeed would depend on the majority of members of the armed forces and federal law enforcement being willing to obey what they seen as illegal and unconstitutional orders. While the members of military and law enforcement tend to lean right they may not lean that far to the right. 

Some of the more extreme MAGAs have threatened a civil war if Trump loses. By this they mean an actual civil war where they will engage in actual battles with the anti-MAGAs. These are the people far more likely than Democrats and non-MAGA Republicans to escalate a conflict to violence but at some point those who want to save democracy would fight back.

If all this comes to pass we will have a nation that would no longer be a democracy. Instead of a country divided by a Mason-Dixon Line it would be fought all over the country. The country would be ungovernable. It would descend into chaos. States would turn into enclaves with governors activating their national guards to defend their borders and their cities.

Roughly half of the country support Trump but not all of them want the country to turn into a country like Russia ruled by a dictator like Putin. 

It is quite possible that the end result of Trump's attempt to become a dictator would be a military coup aided by members of the Secret Service on the White House and Trump's detail.

It's also possible Trump and MAGA would prevail and people like us will be looking over our shoulders in fear that a MAGA neighbor will turn us in for being disloyal. 

A year from now, while I doubt I am important enough to be in jail, I could be publishing my blog on the dark web.

Addendum:

My nightmare scenario fits right in with what cult expert Steve Hassan told Chauncey DeVega in tolday's column 

Cult expert Steve Hassan: "The silencing of critics" is crucial to Trump's "authoritarian control"


Excerpt:

How would you respond to those people who will say that you should not describe the MAGA movement as a cult and/or Donald Trump as a cult leader? And to do so, especially at this moment, is not polite or nice. You should tone it down and be more “responsible” because you, and people like you, are part of the problem in this country with all these troubles and how high the political temperature has risen.

I would tell them that the MAGA movement is in fact an authoritarian cult. It is dangerous, destructive, anti-human rights, anti-woman, racist and white supremacist, antigay and has many other antisocial values and beliefs. The Trump authoritarian personality and the larger antidemocracy movement are very dangerous. People tried to stop these evil forces in the 1930s and 1940s. We can learn from them and rise to the challenge today. It is the very definition of being responsible to tell the truth about these dangers.

Donald Trump and his agents across MAGA and the larger neofascist movement have made it very clear that their "enemies" and critics and anyone else who opposes them will be severely punished, including being put in prison and worse, when/if they take power in 2025. Enemies lists have already been made. This is a documented fact. Given your book "The Cult of Trump" you are likely on one of those lists. Are you afraid? Is that going to change your behavior?

I believe in standing up against such evil I have been confronting danger since I was deprogrammed from the Moonies 48 years ago. I will not be silenced nor flee. I have always stood my ground against cults. Some of them are very powerful with billions of dollars. I will not surrender the truth or be intimidated into silence. I have had my life threatened by these powerful cults for many years. But I'm not going to stop talking. I want to live my life looking in the mirror knowing that I am doing the right thing. I will not just follow the crowd out of fear like too many other people have done in dark times. We need to be brave. I want people to know we are the majority, and they are the minority. If we believe Trump and MAGA will win, then we give up our collective resources and power. We are stronger together.

Second blog of the day: 

Biden must have Trump screaming having suceeded in getting the hostages back from Russia. Now he has to get Mexico to help build the wall. 






Read all blogs here.



July 31, 2024

Message to women with self-respect, if you're not looking askance at Vance you're in a trance. If you glorify the grabber I feel sorry for you. By Hal Brown, MSW

These are made by Photo AI. They are not real. As far as I can tell he hasn't revealed how he feels about actual cats or if he has had them in his family.

Message to women with self-respect, if you're not looking askance at Vance you're in a trance. If you glorify the grabber I feel sorry for you.



Who woulda thunk? Trump put kitty cats, aka pussys, in the headlines. Now Vance brings back cats.

 


JD Vance In 2021: 'We Have To Go To War' Against The Idea That Women Don't Have To Have Kids



Here Are All Of JD Vance's Put-Downs Of Childless Americans

Above were the top two articles on HUFFPOST this morning.

Leave it to Vance to associate his retrograde chauvinistic opinions about women who decide not to have children with cats. It is ironic to note that it was Trump who almost lost the presidency because of using a crude kitty-cat slang term to describe a part of the female anatomy.

I can't determine whether Vance ever had cats in his family. Perhaps he did. It's possible he bought into the mythology of cats as being evil.

 This is from  the NY Times (subscription)

JD Vance and the Age-Old Trope of ‘Childless Cat Ladies’ 


In this country, we can go back to the Salem Witch Trials to find cats inextricably linked to ungovernable women. Late in the winter of 1692, as girls were writhing and convulsing their way to persecution, an enslaved girl named Tituba, married to one man and in love with another, was called to answer to charges of witchcraft before the relevant Massachusetts tribunal. One of the first to be accused, she confessed to the allegations, apparently claiming to have flown on a pole, signed a book by the devil and watched as possessed spectral cats pinched or choked other girls, driving them to madness.

Here's an example of cats depicted as anything but cute and cuddly. It is from the article Woman-as-Cat in Anti-Suffrage Propaganda.


It is difficult for me to fathom how any woman with self respect could support Trump, and not disapprove of his choosing Vance as his running mate. I think they lack self-respect. I feel sorry for them. How, I wonder, could this woman wear the homemade t-shirt (they are available commercially) to a Trump rally:

I'd like to learn more about her and even have a chance to talk to her. She seems to be posing for the photo. I have seen it reposted in other stories. My guess is that she'd be happy to discover that in her own small way she is famous. I'd ask her if she has a husband or boyfriend (I doubt she has a partner who is a woman) and if she does ask her how he feels about her wearing this. I'd inform her that she is being mocked or pitied for wearing this ask her how she feels about this. 

The following is the concluding paragraph in the Politico Magazine opinion essay 

JD Vance Has a Bunch of Weird Views on Gender


Trump lost women by 15 points in 2020; if he has any hope of moving back into the White House he’ll need to make up at least a bit of that ground. But if he hoped the vice presidential pick would help with that he may be sadly mistaken. While Trump’s sexism has manifested as a crude machismo, Vance, along with his New Right fellow-travelers, is about to introduce voters to a more conceptual take on sexism — one which many women, and indeed many men, might find even more alarming.

I can see Vance, who probably unlike Trump, knows what it is, lamenting the fact that the Nineteenth Amendment was ever passed.


I wonder if some disparaging Vance comments about men who love cats being - you know the word used to disparage some men as being less than masculine, weak, and lacking in courage - will come out. 

This would include both Winston Churchill and Abraham Lincoln and we know what wussies they were /s ... the following is from this website:

Winston Churchill’s Feline Companions

Winston Churchill, the iconic British Prime Minister who led his nation through World War II, had a soft spot for cats. He famously said, “I like pigs and dogs. Cats look down on you; dogs look up to you; but pigs look you in the eye and treat you as an equal.” Churchill’s beloved pet cat, Jock, accompanied him during his time at Chartwell, his country residence. They shared a special bond, and Jock was even known to attend meetings with the Prime Minister.

Abraham Lincoln’s White House Cats

Abraham Lincoln, the 16th President of the United States, found companionship in the form of four-legged friends during his tenure. He and his wife, Mary Todd Lincoln, were known for their love of animals, including their cats. President Lincoln’s son, Tad, rescued several stray cats and brought them into the White House, where they became cherished members of the family. These furry companions provided comfort during a tumultuous period in American history.

Of course President Clinton had Socks:



Full disclosure:

I am a cat lover. I've had cats in my life since I was a child. I don't have any now because I am too old at 80 to take one into my life and I don't want to burden anyone with adopting them if and when I die before they do. 

Maybe Vance would consider me a wussie (or the word that rhymes with it). I was a volunteer cat loving cop for 20 years working at least one shift a week usually at night. I wonder if he would have called me that name if I stopped him for suspected drunk driving (according to the article "Drinking with J.D. Vance" he does drink). My partner and I took lots of drivers who failed a field sobriety test to jail. I can visualize doing this to a smug J.D. Vance. 

Just for fun, here's an old photo of me taken at home before I went out to do a shift as a reserve police officer. I am with Julian, one of our cats.


Read all blogs here.

 




 

 



July 30, 2024

George Conway with his Anti-Psychopath PAC has gotten through Trump's fragile, rigid defenses, By Hal Brown, MSW

 

Trump has managed to soldier on through many personal attacks. It is very possible that George Conway who, while a lawyer, deserves an honorary doctoral degree in Trump psychology, may have finally found his Achille's heel. 

He may not be screaming in agony on the outside but he sure seems to be screaming on the inside.




George Conway's new poltical action committee has been running this ad on  Fox News, ESPN, and the Golf Channel in Palm Beach and Bedminster. I expect they assume that they had an audience of one, and that this is what counted for them.


The Anti-Psychopath PAC made it's first splash during the Republican National Convention with billboards and trucks. Below, he explained what an anti-social personality (also called psychopathic disorder) was on MSNBC.




Now we have proof positive (not fake news, folks) that this has gotten to Trump. This is what he posted on Truth Social:

I doubt Trump is going to do what I did. I not only looked at the Anti-Psychopath PAC X page and posted there, but also looked at their Facebook page (here)

This is what I posted on their Facebook page along with the illustration I made for this blog:

Donald Trump was the one who has just been bigly badly hurt and humiliated. He has demonstrated the fragility and rigidity of his psychological defenses as this retired psychotherapist, Dr. Mary Trump, Dr. John Gartner, and many others have pointed out by this unhinged Truth Social Post. He has a case of "if you can't stand the message attack the messenger." George Conway might say "I'm rubber, you're glue, everything you say about me bounces off me and sticks to you (like Ketchup)." He's even been maneuvered into attacking Fox News. I wonder if George has found Trump's Achilles' heel and that this will be his undoing.

It shouldn't be necessary to point out that when Trump accuses someone of something he is guilty of it is a manifestation of the primitive defense mechanism projection. He called Conway crazy!

Not only that, but by saying that he was badly hurt and humiliated by his wife because she must have done some really NASTY (his caps) things to him, he may be revealing what Melania did to him. He said it, I didn't:


Consider what he told Laura Ingram when asked how Melania reacted to seeing him shot:

"Which is OK, because that means she likes me or she loves me. Let's say if she could talk about it freely, that would be, I'm not so sure which is better but ah, she either likes or loves me, that's nice." (Read article)

Trump is a TV addict. He not only watches Fox News but also watches "Morning Joe" because he can't resist watching even his harshest critics talk about him.

With his ego I doubt he will press mute when he sees the Anti-Psychopath and other ads, for example those from The Lincoln Project (of which Conway was a co-founder) are aired.

Thanks to Trump's reactive personality and his way of lashing out against anyone who attacks him, often in the wee hours on Truth Social, we will see how effective these hard-hitting ads are.

Kamala Harris doesn't have to go low when they go low. Of course it was Michelle Obama who said "when they go low, we go high." When Trump and his surrogates take the lowest road possible Harris and her campaign can take the dignified high road. They can leave it to Conway's PAC and The Lincoln Project with the acerbic Rick Wilson (his X page) to deftly and unmercifully rip the bandage off of Trump. (I couldn't resist using that thanks to Trump and his now famous bandage.)

Addendum:

This is Wilson's response to the Trump Truth Social post:



This is The Lincoln Project X page. Image is of a laughing Rick Wilson.



Just an afterthought - this is from an article abut the most famous psychopaths in history. Note who is referred to below:

Thanks to Hollywood portrayals of psychopaths, you might be forgiven for thinking that serial killers are around every corner. Fortunately, Norman Bates is not the proprietor of the local motel and Hannibal Lechter does not do his grocery shopping in the local branch of Asda, so what famous psychopaths in history are there and what hideous crimes did they commit?

A psychopath has a personality disorder, but sadly they cannot be cured. They lack empathy, find it impossible to form an emotional attachment to other human beings, and are much given to violent and criminal behavior. However, not all psychopaths are homicidal maniacs with a predilection towards sharp blades, and in fact the vast majority blend in with the rest of humanity very well. So well in fact, that there could easily be a psychopath in your circle of acquaintances.

George Conway says one is running for president. Psychoanalyst Lance Dodes agrees (read article)











July 29, 2024

Kamala's coconut story has gotten a lot of coverage and literally just made the cover of New York Magazine, by Hal Brown, MSW

 



The New York Magazine cover shows an exhuberant Kamala Harris looking youthful and exuding confidence while sitting on a giant coconut. In the foreground they have Chuck Schumer, AOC, Barak Obama, George Clooney, a sad looking President Biden, Nancy Pelosi, Beyonce, and a leaping Hakeem Jeffries.

 I wasn't able to identify the woman on the left. She could be one of these Kamala supporting singers (read article).



For those who remember the days of JFK's Camelot the name Kamalot will be evocative.


Even those who aren't old enough to remember how Jackie Kennedy remembered his years as president as Camelot (read article) ley alone know that Camelot is a legendary castle and court associated with King Arthur or that it was a hit 1961 Broadway musical. Just the name sounds really, really good. One could be literal and read it as Kam-a-lot mean a lot of Kamala but that is rather boring.

I'd like to envision Kamala as a modern day noble and virtuous Queen Guenevere with lots of liberties taken with the actual story told in the musical. She did help King Arthur put together the Knights of the Round Table made up of knights who do not pillage and fight but instead uphold honor and justice.

We can leave out the part about her and Lancelot....






July 28, 2024

Woke Olympics opening ceremony triggers righteous right, by Hal Brown, MSW

 



I didn't watch any of the opening ceremony of the Olympics. Above is some of what I missed.

This is from the Olympics X account:

The inclusion of costumed drag performers and some others of indeterminate personal gender preference prompted cringing Christian hand wringing implying that Satan himself had ascended from the depths of Hell into River Seine in Paris.

No less a MAGA than Donald Trump, Jr. brought up Satan: 

Donald Trump Jr. Fumes Over 'Satanic' Olympics Opening Ceremony: 'Such A Shame'

I doubt anyone intended this to depict The Last Supper. In fact the Olympic X page said it was meant to refer to the Greek god Dyonysis and to show the absurdity of violence between human beings. From Wiki: The Bacchanalia were unofficial, privately funded popular Roman festivals of Bacchus, based on various ecstatic elements of the Greek Dionysia.

Here's a story from The Hill: 

Speaker Johnson blasts Olympics for mocking Christians, Last Supper


Johnson was nice enough to provide a photo on his X page:

Click above to enlarge.



A far right poster, I suppose she fancies herself to be an influencer (and she probably is) posted these on X:


Fox News had this article" "Viral Catholic leader: Christians must not be ‘weak’ in the face of Olympics opening spectacle"


They posted this video of Catholic leader and evangelist Bishop Robert Barron:


This is a portion of what he said:

France, which used to be called the eldest daughter of the church, Paris, that gave us – Thomas Aquinas taught there, and Vincent De Paul was there, and King Louis IX – St. Louis. France has sent Catholic missionaries all over the world.

France, whose culture – and I mean the honoring of the individual, of human rights, of freedom – is grounded very much in Christianity, felt the right thing to do is mock the Christian faith.

I think, folks, what’s interesting here is this deeply secularist, postmodern society knows who its enemy is. They’re naming it. And we should believe them.
We Christians, we Catholics should not be sheepish, we should resist, we should make our voices heard.

I'm going to put on my theologian's hat here and ask what Jesus would say about all this brouhaha. 


He might say:

Look, people, I know you mean well but you are confused. I was actually at The Last Supper and let me tell you something. Among my 12 apostles we had some real characters. They were all devoted to me and truly good people. I won't mention any of them in particular, but some of them wouldn't be welcomed with open arms in some of the churches you created in my name. I love them all equally. So should you.

More much ado about not much:

I don't think they have anything to apologize for the fact that some people misinterpreted the intention of the performances.



Read all my blogs here.

The blogs are listed on one easy to navigate page here.






Shortly after the damning Jack Smith report was released Trump rants about... wait for it... Seth Meyers, By Hal M. Brown

The Jack Smith report about Trump's election interference was released last night a bit after midnight. Just before 1:30 AM Trump took t...