Click HERE if this page loads slowly. It should open fully almost instantly, if it doesn't click here.
Nov. 17, 2019
Nov. 16, 2019
Nov. 15, 2019
Trump made this the biggest story so far:
‘Wow, little man’: Trump shredded by the internet for attempt to intimidate Yovanovitch as she described corruption
#witnessintimidation is trending
Read the comments to Trump's tweet, made in the midst of the Yovanvitch testimony here. He is obviously watching. Chris Mathews (on MSNBC) said that by showing this tweet Adam Schiff was pointing out that Trump was engaging in witness intimidation. Then in the break in a hallway interview Schiff said the tweet was witness intimidation in real time.
Trump's psychopathology combined with his stupidity may be his undoing. He is recklessly digging himself deeper and deeper into a hole. If he had a lawyer with him willing and able to tell him what not to tweet he'd never have done this. However Trump thinks he is his own best lawyer.
|Click above for story|
|Not a link|
Quote: “Convicted of a crime I didn’t even commit. Hah! Attempted murder? Now honestly, what is that? Do they give a Nobel Prize for attempted chemistry? Do they?” Sideshow Bob from "The Simpson's" HuffPost article about Laura Ingraham saying attempted bribery wasn't mention in the Constitution. --- Watch video:
From The Washington Post:
This rhetorical absurdity, originally intended as a joke on a TV cartoon, is now being trotted out in all seriousness by the GOP. What New York magazine writer Jonathan Chait has called the “Sideshow Bob defense” has become central to Republican efforts to shield President Trump from accusations of wrongdoing. Because the Ukrainian quid pro quo was ultimately unsuccessful, the argument goes, no crime was committed, even if one was attempted. The editorial page of the Wall Street Journal wrote (apparently not joking): “Many people in the Administration opposed the Giuliani effort, including some in senior positions at the White House. This matters because it may turn out that while Mr. Trump wanted a quid-pro-quo policy ultimatum toward Ukraine, he was too inept to execute it.”
.//// BACK ////////////////////////