Showing posts with label Dr. John Gartner. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Dr. John Gartner. Show all posts

November 29, 2025

Is this who we want to be?

 




As a psychotherapist, retired after 40 yrs. of practice, I only occasionally thought about depth psychology. Then Trump came along as a clear and present danger to democracy in 2017. I was one of the first members of the “Duty to Warn” group started by Dr. John Gartner. In USA Today he wrote “Donald Trump’s malignant narcissism is toxic

He wrote that mental health professionals had a duty to warn about a leader who may be unfit to serve. We look back to say and want to change the phrase “may be unfit to serve” to “manifestly not only unfit to serve but a danger to all things lovers of democracy cherish.”

Duty to Warn went on to become a name for a group he founded. Here’s a Psychology Today article about it:

Like Gartner I began to write about how Trump was a malignant narcissist who was not only unfit to be president but also dangerous to democracy.

In 2018 I wrote a column for Capitol Hill Blue titled “Trump’s sadistic malignant narcissism” I moved from writing there to Daily Kos where I put all my posts about Trump’s psychopathology under the heading Trumpology (you can read them here if you want to torture yourself). I left there (okay, I was kicked off and suspended for life - this is another story), to my publishing my own blog. Then when Substack became popular for political writing I moved there and continued to write many articles about this.

What I wrote in 2018 is so relevant today that I am republishing my Capitol Blue column. (The Doug Thompson Capitol Hill Blue website is still online here.

Below is my old article with several updates.

I am hearing more and more commentators on MSNBC talk about Trump’s narcissism when they address his self-centered response to the MAGA bomber. (Cesar Sayoc, known as the “MAGA Bomber,” was arrested for sending 16 mail bombs to critics of President Trump in 2018, including prominent figures like Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton. He was sentenced to 20 years in prison for these actions, which were classified as domestic terrorism.) It is true as far as it goes. However, Trump is not a garden variety narcissist.

His narcissism is so extreme that it overrides any awareness that this is a time to at least pretend that he is presidential. His sarcastic dog whistles at his rallies showing his supporters he doesn’t mean what he reads off a teleprompter are proof of this.

Just this morning, when asked by reporters for his response to the Squirrel Hill synagogue murders (The Squirrel Hill synagogue murders refers to the tragic mass shooting that occurred on October 27, 2018, at the Tree of Life – Or L’Simcha Congregation in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, where 11 worshippers were killed and several others were injured. This attack is considered the deadliest antisemitic incident in U.S. history, perpetrated by Robert Bowers, who was motivated by hate against the Jewish community. Trump’s rambling unscripted answers show a lack of empathy. He focused on how he thought having an armed guard inside the temple could have prevented any deaths, and how we should have the death penalty for such crimes. He refused to answer questions about gun control and the NRA.

I am sure that what was on Trump’s mind was that he again lost control of a news cycle, and that coverage of this was going to be linked to his inciting his followers to act violently.

Wikipedia explains that “a notable difference between “narcissists” and “malignant narcissists” is the “feature of sadism, or the gratuitous enjoyment of the pain of others. A narcissist will deliberately damage other people in pursuit of their own selfish desires, but may regret it and will in some circumstances show remorse for doing so, while a malignant narcissist will harm others and enjoy doing so, showing little empathy or regret for the damage they have caused.”

Malignant is one of the most frightening words many of us have ever heard. It usually refers to cancer which has spread and may be life-threatening. When the preface malignant is applied to the word narcissism it describes Donald Trump.

Nearly two years ago one of the first mental health professionals to warn about the dangerousness of Donald Trump because of his psychopathology was clinical psychologist John D. Gartner. Over two years ago he started an online petition Mental Health Professionals Declare Trump is Mentally Ill And Must Be Removed which eventually had over 70,000 signatures.

On Jan. 27, 2017 US News and World Reports published Temperament Tantrum: Some say President Donald Trump’s personality isn’t just flawed, it’s dangerous

The article had numerous quotes from John Gartner. This was the first mainstream media article to address the alarming situation of having a president so psychologically unfit he represented a grave danger to the nation. Here’s an excerpt:

“Donald Trump is dangerously mentally ill and temperamentally incapable of being president,” says Gartner, author of “In Search of Bill Clinton: A Psychological Biography.” Trump, Gartner says, has “malignant narcissism,” which is different from narcissistic personality disorder and which is incurable.

Gartner acknowledges that he has not personally examined Trump, but says it’s obvious from Trump’s behavior that he meets the diagnostic criteria for the disorder, which include anti-social behavior, sadism, aggressiveness, paranoia and grandiosity. Trump’s personality disorder (which includes hypomania) is also displayed through a lack of impulse control and empathy, and “a feeling that people … don’t recognize their greatness.

“We’ve seen enough public behavior by Donald Trump now that we can make this diagnosis indisputably,” says Gartner.

On May 4, 2017, in USA Today, Gartner had an article published titled “Donald Trump’s malignant narcissism is toxic: Psychologist” 

Gartner explains what he means by malignant narcissism.

Much has been written about Trump having narcissistic personality disorder. As critics have pointed out, merely saying a leader is narcissistic is hardly disqualifying. But malignant narcissism is like a malignant tumor: toxic.

Psychoanalyst and Holocaust survivor Erich Fromm, who invented the diagnosis of malignant narcissism, argues that it “lies on the borderline between sanity and insanity.” Otto Kernberg, a psychoanalyst specializing in borderline personalities, defined malignant narcissism as having four components: narcissism, paranoia, antisocial personality and sadism. Trump exhibits all four.

His narcissism is evident in his “grandiose sense of self-importance … without commensurate achievements.” From viewing cable news, he knows “more about ISIS than the generals” and believes that among all human beings on the planet, “I alone can fix it.” His “repeated lying,” “disregard for and violation of the rights of others” (Trump University fraud and multiple sexual assault allegations) and “lack of remorse” meet the clinical criteria for anti-social personality. His bizarre conspiracy theories, false sense of victimization, and demonization of the press, minorities and anyone who opposes him are textbook paranoia. Like most sadists, Trump has been a bully since childhood, and his thousands of vicious tweets make him perhaps the most prolific cyber bully in history.

One of the most aptly titled books about the psychopathology of Donald Trump was published in the Fall of 2017: The Dangerous Case of Donald Trump.

In 27 essays by mostly mental health professionals, the book explained how Trump was affecting the mental health of the people of the United States, how he put the country at grave risk of involving it in a war and of undermining democracy itself because of his psychopathology.

I think that what “The Art of the Deal” author Tony Schwartz (he is the co-author of “The Art of the Deal,” a book published in 1987 that is credited to Donald Trump. Schwartz has expressed regret about writing the book, stating that he feels it contributed to Trump’s public persona and success) told MSNBC host Ari Melber is part and parcel of Trump’s malignant narcissism:

“Given the time you’ve spent with him, what do you see as his relationship with the specter of violence?” MSNBC anchor Ari Melber asked. “Explain what you understand to be his fascination of violence and the way he’s infused that in his politics.”

“So when I go back to the late 1980s, his obsession were — he had two obsessions, one was with football … and the other boxing,” Schwartz recalled. “He was a huge boxing fan and boxing promoter.”

“He loved black people to commit violence against other black people — while he watched,” he explained.

Schwartz summed up Trump’s view as, “You do the violence, I’ll watch the violence. I wouldn’t go near it because it would terrify me, but I love watching it.”

“Why? Because underneath that is rage,” Schwartz concluded. “This is a man of great rage and the rage is, he’s aggrieved.”

“He’s in the business of being aggrieved, and he’s using that in these 10, 12 days leading up to the midterms in trying to bring it out in all the people that are possibly going to vote on the Republican side in this next phase,” he explained. AlterNet

Added to his malignant narcissism where those so inclined can find examples of every diagnostic criterion are the following other behaviors:

  • lack of any demonstration of having the ability to empathize

  • total lack of introspection

  • history of pleasure touching women’s private parts against their will (clinically called Frotteuristic Disorder)

  • his pathological lying

  • his impaired reality testing often to the level of having paranoid beliefs

  • his lack of verbal impulse control

  • his reckless ideas (as leaked from White House) stopped before he could act on them

  • and other characteristics that lead me to suggest he needs a diagnosis of his own.

One can argue about the clinical accuracy or ethics of making a distant diagnosis of a president, however, his behavior this week should dispel any doubt that there is something severely amiss in the psychological functioning of Donald Trump.

——–—

P.M. Update:

On Day Of Mass Shooting, Trump Jokes He Nearly Canceled Speech Due To ‘Bad Hair Day’: Trump made the comment at the Future Farmers of America Convention in Indianapolis.

He recalled for the crowd (at the Future Farmers convention) that earlier in the day, he had been holding a news conference about the mass shooting ― which he referred to as a “very unfortunate news conference” ― when he became drenched from the wind and rain. The elements apparently left his hair looking not exactly the way he likes it.

“I said, ‘Maybe I should cancel this arrangement because I have a bad hair day,’” he told the crowd. “And the bad news ― somebody said, ‘Actually it looks better than it usually does.’”

Though he drew laughter from the crowd, many people found the joke to be in poor taste, given the circumstances. Read some of the social media reaction here.

Recently I wrote about how he met the criteria for being in the Dark Triad. Then I discovered the Dark Tetrad. This adds sadism to the triad of Machiavellianism, being a psychopath and an extreme narcissist. He fits this too.

I wrote this in March: “Sadists ® U.S: Trump and The Dark Tetrad,”

Today Sabrina Haake wrote the following:

Below is the gist of the comment I posted on her Substack:

Of course Trump will ignore the law and relish the use of the military to satisfy his need for power, control, and cruelty --- without getting blood on his hands or taking any personal risk. That is for his soldiers to do whether they are in ICE, Customs and Border Patrol, the National Guard, or the active service currently murdering people on boats.

If they have guns Trump will make them part of his combined Gestapo/SS. As long as they obey illegal orders he will be able to use them to enforce his brutal will and forward his diabolical agenda.

Yesterday I wrote “Half the country has a moral compass and thinks that Trump is the worst president in history. Half have no moral compass and think he is the greatest.”

Today I ask whether those in the country who have lost their moral compass - or never even had one - want us to be the kind of country Trump and his associates want it to be.

Thanks for reading Hal Brown's Substack! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.

Share

Leave a comment

Previous Substacks

Share Hal Brown's Substack

My comments in RawStory

RawStory: go-to site for breaking news.

Trump psychology

About Perchance AI images

.

November 18, 2025

The Trump dementia question: Does Trump have some screws loose? This is a serious subject. The illustration is meant for stress relief both for me and for my readers.

 




Mary Trump (article above) thinks her uncle has dementia. She may be correct, but she’s not an expert.

Donald Trump stated that he had an MRI as part of a routine physical and described the results as “outstanding,” although he admitted he did not know what specific body part was analyzed during the scan. We don’t even know if he had a brain MRI. If he did, it should be noted that an MRI cannot directly diagnose dementia, but it can reveal brain changes associated with different types of dementia, such as brain atrophy or lesions. It is often used to rule out other conditions that may cause similar symptoms.  Reference 1 / Reference 2 

Let’s get one thing straight. Neither Mary Trump, a clincial psychologist who only did psychotherapy with patients in her one year internship, nor I, a clincial social worker who diagnosed and treated patients for 40 year, are qualified to diagnose dementia. Neither is Duty to Warn founder Dr. John Gartner who has seen numerous psychotherapy patients. He says Trump has dementia (see, Trump’s ‘cognitive decline’ putting U.S. at ‘grave risk’) and is often quoted.

The experts at diagnosing dementia are neurologists, neuropsychologists, and some gerontologists.

I asked Chat-GTP whether neurologists think. Trump has dementia and this is what I got:

Do Neurologists Think Trump Has Dementia?

Opinions among neurologists and mental health professionals regarding Donald Trump’s cognitive health and potential dementia vary significantly, often influenced by political perspectives.

Current Evaluations and Opinions

  1. Cognitive Screening Results:

    • Donald Trump has publicly mentioned taking the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), a test designed to assess cognitive function. He has claimed to have received perfect scores, suggesting normal cognitive abilities. However, experts point out that this test is not intended to measure intelligence or IQ.

  2. Expert Opinions:

    • Some neurologists and psychologists express concerns about Trump’s mental fitness, citing observable behaviors. For example, neurologist Dr. John Gartner has explicitly stated that he believes Trump shows signs of dementia, including memory and behavioral decline, particularly in comparison to earlier years.

    • On the contrary, Trump’s physician reported comprehensive evaluations indicating no abnormalities in his cognitive or neurological functions during his annual physical.

  3. Public Perception and Media Commentary:

    • Public discourse often reflects divisions in opinion. Supporters may interpret Trump’s cognitive assessments positively, while critics cite instances of strange behavior or speech as indicative of cognitive decline.

    • Comments from figures like Cornell University psychologist Harry Segal have suggested that erratic behavior can signal “accelerating cognitive decline.”

  4. Dementia Assessments vs. IQ Tests:

    • The confusion surrounding cognitive tests often arises from Trump’s characterization of them as “IQ tests.” Experts clarify that assessments like the MoCA are specifically designed for identifying cognitive impairments associated with conditions like dementia, not for evaluating general intelligence.


Summary of Concerns

  • While official tests show that Trump performs well on cognitive assessments, many experts raise alarms about his behavioral signs that could suggest cognitive decline. These assessments lead to ongoing debates about his mental health, particularly in the context of his political career. Given the sensitive nature of cognitive health issues, the discussions are often politically charged, reflecting broader divisions in public opinion

    Note that Dr. Gartner is referred to in this.

    article where he’s called a specialist.

    Dr. John Gartner, a specialist in the field, has observed that Trump, now 79, appears to be slowing down, with potential impairment in his motor skills. This observation follows sightings of Trump allegedly wearing a catheter under his right pant leg, which Gartner suggests could indicate the president is suffering from a specific type of dementia known as frontotemporal dementia.

    Unfortunately, as far as I can tell the actual experts in dementia who have come out to suggest there are signs Trump has dementia are few and none have become prominent. One whose name was not familiar to me until I began to research this Substack is Dr. Narinder Kapur, a consultant neuropsychologist and visiting professor at the University College London. He said that “the president’s behavior over the last six months has been ‘quite odd and strange,’ as reported by Express, UK. (Reference) In this article once again John Gartner is referred to as follows:

    Psychologist Dr. John Gartner, formerly of Johns Hopkins University, has tracked what he describes as a “major deterioration” in Trump’s language skills, motor skills, and impulse control. “If you go back and look at film from the 1980s, [Trump] actually was extremely articulate… now he really has trouble completing a thought and that is a huge deterioration,” Gartner told The Guardian.

    What we basically have is a number of mental health professionals from the neice of Donald Trump to well known names like John Gartner, with a smattering of actual experts in dementia, weighing in with speculation that Trump has dementia. So has psychologist Harry Segal (here) and here. This is based on their observations of behavior that is often seen in people with early dementia. 

    Mary Trump has an edge because she can compare his behavior to his father’s.

    Nobody is able to put a percentage on the likelihood he has any kind of dementia. This much is certain: 

  • Trump claimed a quick test called the MOCA proves he has no cogntive impairment. This test cannot diagnose dementia with any degree of certainty. It can suggest someone might, but even passing it doesn’t prove they don’t. It also should be noted that if someone is so inclined they can take sample tests online. It’s possible someone close to Trump knew he’d be given this test and made sure he practiced taking it.

  • Trump says he passed his MRI with flying colors. A brain MRI cannot rule dementia in or out.

Neurologists, especially those who specialize in treating dementia patients, neuropsychologists who are also qualified, and many gerontologists, have had ample opportunity to observe Trump on television. 

One expert to go public with an assessment of Trump’s possible cognitive impairment is neuroscientist Bobby Azarian. He explained how Trump and Biden’s cognitive impairments were different here. (See his website.)

He wrote:

As a neuroscientist myself, the question I’m mulling is whether Trump’s suspected brain damage is only in the area associated with speech production, known as Broca’s area, or also in the region associated with language comprehension, known as Wernicke’s area. The kind of paraphasia Trump is demonstrating, which does not involve a nonsensical pattern of words, is more likely to be a problem related to speech production, which is a less serious cognitive impairment.

The Trump-related gaffes that are much more concerning to me involve Trump confusing one person for another, in a way that is not just the result of a name slip, but an actual confusion of one person for another.

Even if a hundred of them issued a statement that urged that, based on what they have been seeing of him, they urge in the strongest possible terms that he undergo a complete assessment for dementia, it wouldn’t make any difference.

Here’s a Chat-gpt4 description of what this would entail:

Complete Dementia Assessment Components

complete dementia assessment typically involves a comprehensive evaluations to determine cognitive function, behavioral changes, and other health issues. This process often includes several key components:

1. Medical History Review

  • Patient History: Gathering information about cognitive decline, memory loss, and any other symptoms.

  • Family History: Investigating any family history of dementia or neurological disorders.

  • Current Medications: Reviewing all medications to identify any that may affect cognition.

2. Physical Examination

  • Neurological Exam: Assessing reflexes, coordination, sensory perception, and motor skills.

  • Vital Signs: Measuring blood pressure, heart rate, and other essential health metrics.

3. Cognitive Assessments

  • Standardized Tests: Using tools like the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) or the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) to evaluate memory, attention, and problem-solving abilities.

  • Functional Assessments: Evaluating the ability to perform daily activities, which can provide insight into the extent of cognitive impairment.

4. Neuropsychological Testing

  • This may include a more in-depth analysis of cognitive functions such as memory, language, and executive functioning, often conducted by a neuropsychologist.

5. Laboratory Tests

  • Blood Tests: To rule out other causes of cognitive impairment (e.g., vitamin deficiencies, thyroid issues, infections).

  • Imaging Studies: CT or MRI scans may be used to identify structural changes in the brain, such as atrophy associated with dementia.

6. Psychiatric Evaluation

  • Assessment for Mood Disorders: Evaluating for depression or anxiety, which can coexist with dementia and complicate the diagnosis.

7. Caregiver and Family Input

  • Gathering insights from family members or caregivers about changes in behavior or cognitive decline over time.

I wrote the following in January:

The crucial words are “may not have.” What has chnaged since then is that I see ore behavioral indications he may have dementia that I did in January. However, I continue to want to be tentative and not go out on a limb and say he probably has this tragic disease. If he does as I worte previously, time will tell since the disease always gets worse. 

As long as there are other explanations for his behavior some consider indications of dementia like stress or even a manic psychosis all we can do is wait and see.

Thanks for reading Hal Brown's Substack! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.

Share

Leave a comment

Previous Substacks

Share Hal Brown's Substack

My comments in RawStory

RawStory: go-to site for breaking news.

Trump psychology

About Perchance AI images

As if being a foul-mouthed sadistic malignant narcissist isn't enough, he's a foul-mouthed sadistic misogynistic malignant narcissist. He's crude, he's rude, he's shrewd, and they love him for this.

  Scroll down for my Dec. 10th post. As if being a foul-mouthed sadistic malignant narcissist isn't enough, he's a foul-mouthed sadi...