Showing posts with label Hal Brown's Substack. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hal Brown's Substack. Show all posts

October 28, 2025

Half the nation is okay, blasé, or in favor of a police state, but what could eventually liberate us from totalitarianism? Could it be a military "hell no we won't go?"by Hal M. Brown


 

Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.

If you watched Rachel Maddow last night (watch it here) you saw her opening segment about how Trump has a new tool to implement a supercharged Nazi-like police state that even George Orwell hadn’t imagined for Big Brother. She described what the spyware that the government has purchased, which is called Paragon, can do. This is from Wikipedia:

It’s worth going to Wiki again for a detailed explanation of a police state:

police state is a state whose government institutions exercise an extreme level of control over civil society and liberties. There is typically little to no distinction between the law and the exercise of political power by the executive, and the deployment of internal security and police forces play a heightened role in governance. A police state is a characteristic of authoritarian, totalitarian or illiberal regimes (contrary to a liberal democratic regime). Such governments are not exclusive to simply one-party states or dominant-party states, as they can also arise in a democracy or multi-party system.

Originally, a police state was a state regulated by a civil administration, but since the beginning of the 20th century it has “taken on an emotional and derogatory meaning” by describing an undesirable state of living characterized by the overbearing presence of civil authorities. The inhabitants of a police state may experience restrictions on their mobility, or on their freedom to express or communicate political or other views, which are subject to police monitoring or enforcement. Political control may be exerted by means of a secret police force that operates outside the boundaries normally imposed by a constitutional state.Robert von Mohl, who first introduced the rule of law to German jurisprudence, contrasted the Rechtsstaat (”legal” or “constitutional” state) with the anti-aristocratic Polizeistaat(”police state”).

We also have stories like this:

Unfortunately the word “police” (which you see in the photo above) for the ordinary citizen doesn’t instill the fear it should unless they are hard core felons, or even minor lawbreakers who blow through a red light or speed and their heart races when they see the blue lights strobbing on top of the car behind them.

Trump’s armed thugs do a disservice to real police by having the word on their clothing. Real police are supposed to protect, serve, and to protect people from criminals.

Even the term “secret police” doesn’t lead to terror for those who root for the James Bond types in spy stories. 

This is the kind of secret police that Trump wants for the country:

He also wants to expand what he already has on the streets terrorizing people with all the armed thugs that comprise his anti-immigrant army. It used to be called ICE, but doesn’t currently have a name. It is the force that combines armed agents from Border Patrol, the FBI, ATF, Homeland Security, and even the IRS. They aren’t at all “secret” like the often dapperly dressed 007, but they don’t have uniforms like the Nazi SS.

Trump’s SS wears a hodgepodge of outfits, often with jeans or kakki pants, and some kind of weapon festooned bulletproof vest on top. The frequently wear a mask which not only hides their identities but makes them look more intimidating, as if that’s needed what with all the weapons they carry and their reputation for brutality.

These storm troopers are anything but secret. They come in with a bang, sometimes literally with the explosions of tear gas canisters, and they do their dirty work sometimes shooting people with non-lethal weapons or beating them, and then dragging some of them off to be at the mercy of another group of psychopaths who think they are doing God’s work.

They are not. Only about 50% are feeling various levels of concern, from terror to being blasé. 

Some, like me, see our democracy, and myself, about to drown caught in a whirlpool from which there’s no rescue, no life preserver that can be thrown to save us. 

Others hold out hope coming from the courts or the Democrats winning control of Congress in the next election. I think Trumpism can be slowed down but I don’t see how it can be stopped through the normal democratic proccess.

I have a fleeting sense of hope that there will be a proverbial red line which Trump will cross, probably a confluence of circumtances, which will lead to a decidedly undemocratic resolution. This could eventually restore democracy. It would involve the military saying a very hard “hell no we won’t go” when ordered to turn against American citizens. 

If this happens the numbers would have to be exponentially greater than the two soldiers described in this story:

I asked in my title what could liberate us from totalitarianism. It took a concerted effort by the Allies to save the world from the Axis powers. This culminated with D-Day and ended with Hiroshima and Nagasaki. We don’t have that kind of time. I desperately hope that our liberation is non-violent. Perhaps it could be achieved with the “hell no, we won’t go” I used AI to illustrate in this Substack.

I just looked at Sabrina Haake’s Facebook page where she wrote about Democracy.IO:

This is an incredible free resource. It makes it easy to contact your senators and representatives, all you do is enter your address and it populates the email addresses to Congress assigned to your location. A screen pops up, you write your message and it sends it to your elected representatives.

it came from someone urging dems to thank their representatives for fighting back on the budget, and for holding their ground to pressure the republicans not to throw 12 million people off their health insurance plan. 

She included this link:

My reply, alas, may look overly pessimsitc to some though obviously I think it is realistic. This is what I wrote:

I am afraid that this is a feel-good excercise. Our Democratic Party members of Congress aready know how we feel. If we have Republican members they don’t care. I might say I hate to throw cold water on optimism, but that would be a lie. I am quite deliberate in doing this. I regret doing it. I feel like I am still a psychotherapist working with clients clinging to wishful thinking or false hopes and trying to figure out how to get through to them in ways that will help them cope with inevitable bad outcomes. My Substack today was prompted by Rachel’s show last night. It was about the government use of spyware. I see this as just one way they are well on their way to establishing a police state. I do see hope for a rescue, but it would be drastic and I am no way sure it will happen.

I refuse to be like this, hiding my head ad my feelings in a happy smile Amazon envelop…

… when I really feel like this:

For those with sharp eyes the sign in the background is from a famous Paul Krasner poster from The Realist. Read about it here.

Thanks for reading Hal Brown's Substack! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work not by sending money, just by subscribing and reading what I post.

Leave a comment

Previous Substacks

Share Hal Brown's Substack

My comments in RawStory

RawStory: go-to site for breaking news.

My RawStory comments

Portland Media:

KOIN

KGW

OPB

KATU (Sinclair)








October 27, 2025

My request for readers of Hal Brown's Substack on Google Blogger to read the same daily political essays on Substack. By Hal M. Brown, MSW

Hal Brown's Substack Hal Brown's Substack | Substack Hal Brown I'm a retired psychotherapist who writes about politics. Click to read Hal Brown's Substack, a Substack publicat...


I am trying to enhance the search engine ability  for my Substack, which is also published on Google Blogger, to be found. This is where you are reading these words right now. 

To do this I am experimenting with code from Chat GPT5. This code is not visible to readers. Here's just a portion of what it looks like:

I am also publishing this with the HTML code provided by Google Blogger.

I would prefer that those who come across my essays here on the Google Blogger platform read what I post on Substack for several reasons.
If you don't know what Substack is, here's an explanation from Wikipedia.


 One reason for reading it there is that I update there throughout the day and not on Google Blogger. Another is that it has the only comments section I read and reply to. Also this is where you can easily subscribe for free to be notified of all my new posts.

I like to know about how many people look at what I write and I trust the stats on Substack but am not sure how accurate the count is on Google Blogger where sometimes it shows around 20,000 readers and other times just several thousand. It also indicates I have many international readers which doesn't make sense to me. If true I really wonder why this is and wouldlike to hear from some of them in comments of the Substack site. Who, for example, read my essays in China, Hong Kong, and Singapore?






Fo the purposes of this test I am posting the following:





"If only he would die," one might say after reading Chauncey DeVega today. I'd say back "I'm not sure it would make any difference, Vance would do the same things."

  Some may read read an article in Salon this morning and mournfully said the words in my title. To this I would respond with the equally so...