Who are those masked men? They certainly aren't Lone Rangers. By Hal M. Brown

 This is the first episode of the Lone Ranger TV show where the question “who was that masked man” was asked and then, by themselves in front of the sheriff’s office, Tonto asked the Lone Ranger if he’d ever take off the mask when they were fighting the bad guys and he explained why he wouldn’t. Watch the video here. In the early radio shows, the TV show, or movies, in closing scene just before the “hi-yo Silver away” someone always asked something along the lines of “who was that masked man?’

Follows is the creed of the Lone Ranger. It was written by the creator of the Lone Ranger Francis Striker. He also created the Green Hornet and Sgt. Preston of the Yukon:

I believe that to have a friend,

a man must be one.

That all men are created equal

and that everyone has within himself

the power to make this a better world.

That God put the firewood there but that every man must gather and light it himself.

In being prepared physically, mentally, and morally to fight when necessary for that which is right.

That a man should make the most of what equipment he has.

That 'This government, of the people, by the people and for the people'shall live always.

That men should live by the rule of what is best for the greatest number.

That sooner or later... somewhere...somehow... we must settle with the world and make payment for what we have taken.

That all things change but truth, and that truth alone, lives on forever.

In my Creator, my country, my fellow man.

Now we have a cadre of masked men and women who aren’t fighting for law and order. There’s no way they follow the Lone Ranger Creed, let along the U.S. Constitution. If they we wouldn’t see them trampling on the cherished rights of people accountable to nobody. They are behaving like the villains the Lone Ranger and Tonto (someone Trump and his anti woke minions would consider a DEI hire) brought to justice.

No doubt you’ve followed the story about the mayor of Newark and the members of Congress who tried to get into the New Jersey detention center and were arrested.

What made me sick inside and sick for my country was watching all the federal agents. 

Some had uniforms, some bullet proof vests with ammunition and others wore light jackets with names of various Trump SS-like agencies on the back, others just seemed to be in regular clothes. I wasn't able to count how many, but there seemed to be at least 20. They look like they might be preparing to raid a drug cartel hideout.

You can see them in action in the video on the left below.

A few of the agents had their faces exposed but most of them were masked. The simple explanation as to why these agents decide to be masked is that they want to hide their identities. I think there are other reasons. One is that this enables them to feel empowered to be more violent than they’d be if their face was exposed. The other is that it is more intimidating to be confronted by someone in a mask wearing dark sunglassed. When interacting with someone who has this kind of power you want to look them in the eyes, you want to see their face.

It was, to put it mildly, a chaotic scene:

.

Why doesn't the fashion conscious Trump and his psychopathic and sadistic Himmler, Tom Homan, get them all to wear the same uniform instead of a hodgepodge of outfits? After all the country is fast becoming Nazified. If they want their own SS or Gestapo they might as well all wear the same uniform. Camo fabric might be the most intimidating, but whatever they wear red arm bands with T on them would be appropriate.

Update from BlueSky:

Thanks for reading my free Substack! Subscribe for free to receive new posts by email.

This post is public so feel free to share it.

Share

Read all my Substacks.

Recent Substacks:

Does anybody know what the f**k Trump believes when he says things like he did today? By Hal M. Brown

 

When Trump stopped to talk with reporters on his way to speak with Republican lawmakers about getting the budget bill passed he went off on the following tangent:

But I really — we're going to start looking into this whole thing with who signed this legislation, who signed legislation opening our border. I don't think he knew! I said, there's nobody that could want an open border. Nobody. And now I find out that it wasn't him. He opened it. Who was operating the auto pen? This is a very serious thing. We had a president that didn't sign anything. He had almost everything. He opened the borders of the United States of America, and I kept saying, who would do such a thing? Allowing criminals to pour in from all over the world, not just South America — all over the world.

They came in from Africa, they came in from Asia, they came from the Congo, the prisons in the Congo, in Africa. These are rough, rough people. The prisons from the Congo are empty. You know where they are? They're in this country. Who would sign this? Nobody would sign it. No sane person would sign it. You know who signed it? Radical left lunatics that were running our country and the autopen signed it.

And they didn't want him (Biden). And they were disappointed in getting him because they wanted Bernie Sanders. And then after about two weeks, they said, 'Wait a minute, this is a gift. He'll do anything. We're going to use the autopen.' And they use the autopen and everything. He didn't approve this stuff because when Joe Biden was with it, he would never have approved that. You take a look. he would have never approved open borders.

These remarks came at the 1:40 mark in the video which you can see here.

How much of this does Trump really believe? Does he believe any of it? Is all of it a performance? Nobody but Trump really knows and he may not even know himself.

For example, are the prisons in Congo empty because all their “rough, rough” inmates are now here thanks to Biden?

The governemt of Congo begs to differ:

‘Everything he is saying isn’t true’: Congolese governments denounce Trump’s baseless stories about emptied prisons.

Excerpt:

There is no evidence for former President Donald Trump’s repeated claims that “the Congo” has emptied prisons to allow violent criminals to come to the US border as migrants – and the governments of both the Democratic Republic of Congo and the neighboring Republic of Congo say Trump’s assertions are entirely false.

“Everything he is saying isn’t true,” Democratic Republic of Congo spokesperson Patrick Muyaya Katembwe told CNN in a text message on Thursday. Asked specifically about Trump’s claims about Congolese prisons being emptied of violent criminals, he said, “Never ever, it’s not true.” And, he said, “we want him to stop” telling these stories, since “it’s very bad for the country.”

Serge Mombouli, the Republic of Congo’s ambassador to the US, said in an email to CNN on Friday: “There is no truth or any sign nor a single fact supporting such a claim or statement.”

Put this in the “Does He Believe It Or Not?” file along with the ludicrous fairy tale about Haitians eating pets in Springfield (see Wikipedia):

(Amazingly, above is a Twitter post by the Republican-controlled United States House Committee on the Judiciary on September 9, 2024, referencing the hoax with an AI-generated picture.)

Trump obviously is driven to attack Biden at every opportunity and the announcement that he has stage four cancer hasn’t given him pause. His attacking Biden yesterday came as an abrupt segue from one topic to another. I’m reminded of the first shark attack scene from Jaws (here).

At least before then the happy swimmer was attacked the audience was warned by the ominious music. We knew it was coming anyway because the name of the movies was “Jaws.”

Perhaps we should have a musical sound track playing just before Trump goes off on a nasty rant. He is, after all, like a shark in a feeding frenzy when it senses blood in the water.

What explains this aspect of Trump’s behavior? Could it be he has a dual personality? If he does, he could have one amiable personality that makes sense and another nasty and delusional one telling him what to blurt out when he’s talking about something else.

Thanks for reading my Substack! Subscribe for free to receive new posts by email.

I always appreciate it when you share my Substacks.

Share

Read all my Substack.

Recent:

Trump, love, and stuff.

There are updates to this here.

Is Trump lovable or unlovable? I suppose it depends on who you ask. Mary Trump says the following:

"Nobody likes Donald. He's unlikable and he's unlovable." (Read article “Trump's psychologist niece spills about 'great trauma' that made him who he is” and listen to her interview here.)

If you ask, as I did, Perchance AI for an illustration of Trump on a Valentine’s Day card, aside from a few like the one on the top of this page, you come up with a rather unlovable looking fellow:

Perchance AI photo generator had its own “opinion” about who Trump really loves:

Many of the comments to the RawStory article, probably the majority since I haven’t read all 189 of them, lambast Trump in one way or another. For example from Kerry Kalvert:

Nature or nuture?

I have never encountered examples of a sewer rat born into a pack of cannibals grow up to be anything other than a cannibal.

It is a chicken or egg proposition.

But I am pretty sure if Trump’s mother was the virgin Mary and his brother was baby Jesus, baby Jesus would have been thrown out of the manger into the pig sty and we would not be infested with Christians.

Only a few address his psychopathology or the childhood experiences which shaped his malevolent personality. Some commenters suggest it is not relevant to understand him at all to which I respond with Sun Tzu’s dictum in “The Art of War” about how important it is to know the enemy, and oneself in order to be victorious.

One of the comments from a frequent RawStory commenter, Ricardo Santos, who I agree with follows.

Like I said many times, the motherfcker suffers from Mother issues (losing out on his bonding stage of development) which makes him needy, seeking approval, validation and adulation. As well as, being sociopathic having no empathy, bullying (defense mechanism) in getting what he wants, and being a serial killer. Though he does not actually do the killing, we saw that he is capable of doing, seeing millions die because of his Covid decisons. I asked and have been asking, will he beat his record of 1+ million Covid death, or beat Stalin's murdering of 20+ millions of his own citizens. Well, 16 people died from tornados 3 days ago do to lack of weather announcement, the airplane disasters occurring now, and how many have died because of the cancellation of the Foreign aid funding? Add the 30 million that are going to lose their Medicaid? He also suffers from Father issues, feelings of inadequacies (raping/sexually abusing women), though he is a narcissist displaying signs of self aggrandizement (I'm better than my generals, posting AI images of himself), never wrong but knowing he is a failure, intimidated by intellectual men and women who oppose him, because it reminds him of daddy dearest who rejected his incompetence! He carries so much hate and anger and he wants his revenge for being born. Like Doc Holiday said, "A man like Ringo (Trump) has got a great big hole, right in the middle of him. He can never kill enough, or steal enough, or inflict enough pain to ever fill it." Or like Mary's book Titled says, "Too Much and Never Enough

Mary Trump said the following:

"Much of Donald's characterological disorder is based on the fact that he is an extremely weak person, and this is going to sound reductive but I promise you this is true, who has never gotten what he most needed and wanted in life, which is to be loved. That is still what he most needs and wants."

In his classic book “The Art of Loving” Eric Fromm writes in the preface: that the book does not provide instruction in what he terms the "art of loving", but rather argues that love, rather than a sentiment, is an artistic practice. Any attempt to love another is bound to fail, if one does not commit their total personality to learning and practicing loving. He states that "individual love cannot be attained without the capacity to love one's neighbour, without true humility, courage, faith and discipline." (Wikipedia)

I generally agree with Mary Trump but in this case I take issue with her when she says nobody likes her uncle and that he’s both unlikable and unlovable. She doesn’t take into consideration here that there are people who have their own pathological needs which developed when they were children for various reasons to love someone like Donald Trump. You can see this manifest in the extent to which they exhibit their feelings for him, to how much they fawn over him and seem to worship him. Some of course are kowtowing to him to curry his favor because he has power over them and they may actually dislike him, or even despise him. Some may dislike themselves for being so duplicitous, but I have no doubt that many of them have true feelings of what for them can reasonably be called love even if it is pathological. Maybe they never had a cold and distant father and crave any morsel of attention from Trump because he is a father figure to them.

If Trump could be unflinchingly honest with himself he’d realize that very few people in his life truly loved him. He’d see that the people who say they love him are attracted to his power and love him to satisfy there own needs, some healthy (Ivanka when she was a child comes to mind) and others for what I suspect are pathological reasons having to do with their own childhood experiences (Marjorie Taylor Greene, Laura Loomer, and many female members of his cult for example). It is debatable whether any of his wives loved him for healthy reasons.

Eva loved Adolph, so anything is possible.

Thanks for reading my Substack! Subscribe for free to receive new posts by email.

Share

Share Hal Brown's Substack

Read all my Substacks.

Recent:

The hell with attempts at clever wordsmithing, plain and simple in two days Trump proves how he's a mentally unwell rageaholic. By Hal M. Brown, MSW, With his revenge fueled rapid rampages and rants no objective person can deny he's a rageaholic.

The two posts above should constitute enough proof that Donald Trump is a mentally unwell rageaholic. The first could stand alone. It is a response to highly critical things Bruce Springsteen said about him on his overseas concert tour. The second comes out of the recesses of Trump’s fevered mind. Taylor Swift hasn’t been in the news saying anthing critical of Trump. She merely exists as a hotter than hot superstar and Trump can’t stand this. Therefore, why not follow-up an attack on The Boss with an attack on Swift. She could be called The Boss if Springsteen already hadn’t earned that name.

Attacking Taylor Swift doesn’t make sense. That is, it doesn’t make sense unless you’re Donald Trump.

It wouldn’t surprise me if he’d have thrown in an attack against Joe Biden just for good measure.

Amend that…

I just checked Truth Social. He did at 5:34 this morning:

Then this morning we have these stories which provide further justification for my “diagnosis” of Trump as an unwell rageaholic.

Trump rampages after 'bad and dangerous day'

and

'Historically criminal event': Trump rants about 'bigger scandal' in early morning blow-up

Most people know what a rageholic is. This is as good a defintion as any (from Psych Central):

Rageaholic definition

“Rageaholic“ isn’t a diagnosis recognized in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5).

This doesn’t mean rageaholic symptoms aren’t real, or that the uncontrollable flashes of anger you experience aren’t significant.

Rageaholism does exist. It’s been written about and explored in research Trusted Source, and it’s an informal term used to describe someone who seems unable to control their temper.

Often, a rageaholic will display unprovoked bouts of rage or a level of anger excessive for the given situation.

Trump’s rage attacks are part and parcel of his narcissistic personality disorder, that is, his exaggerated feelings of self-importance, excessive need for admiration, and a diminished ability to empathize with other people's feelings.

Trump postures as a strutting peacock who delights in showing off his feathers.

In reality under the pretense of supreme self-confidence are deeply buried feelings of inferiority. Therapists have written about this but none with the inside knowledge of his niece Mary Trump who diagnoses him as having a narcissstic personality disorder (read “A Provocative Psychological Analysis of Trump by a Trump”)

There is a phenomena which occurs with extreme narcissists called narcissistic injury (see Wikipedia). We see aspects of this with Trump but he never actually experiences the hurts of the injury. Consider this from Wikipedia:

A narcissistic injury will oftentimes not be noticeable by the subject at first sight. Narcissistic injuries, or narcissistic wounds, are likely a result of criticism, loss, or even a sense of abandonment. Those diagnosed with narcissistic personality disorder will come off as excessively defensive and attacking when facing any sort of criticism. While the average person would likely react by expressing vulnerability, a person dealing with a narcissistic wound will do the opposite, causing them to come off as narcissistic, despite feeling hurt inside. The reaction of a narcissistic injury is a cover-up for the real feelings of one who faces these problems

Trump doesn’t come off as defensive when criticized because he instantly goes into attack mode. He does not experience an assault on his self-esteem even for a conscious nano-second.

Thanks for reading my Substack! Subscribe for free to receive new posts by email.

Share

If you want to support my work please feel free to share this.

Share

Read previous Substacks.