January 11, 2025

The politics of booze, by Hal M. Brown

 



If wine consumption is reduced significantly it will hurt wine grape growers in my home state of Oregon, across the country, and in the rest of the world. I don't know what crops, if any, would replace the grapes growing in our beautiful wine country. The picture is from one of our many road trips to this part of the state.


Rawstory has an article (above) about lawmakers calling the new surgeon general report about even light alcohol consumption being a cancer risk being an example of the "nanny state." 

The report  is on the NIH National Cancer Institute website so RFK Jr's opinion on this is important. The report could be taken offline when Trump takes over. It is important to consider that Trump not only doesn't drink, but he has negative feelings about drinking. This is because of his alcoholic older brother, Freddy, who died at 43. It has been reported (see article in VICE) that he never had a sip of alcohol. 

Whether this would influence the infamously transactional Trump to try to suppress the report or not remains to be seen. The alcohol lobby in Washington is huge and many MAGAs rage against government interference in their lives. It is not only "the deep state" that is evil in their eyes, but "the nanny state." This has not been part of the current poltical zeitgeist but with alcohol it could be.

On the health side, the crucial parts of the report for light to moderate drinkers are those explaining the cancers that this may cause. Even light drinking increases the risk for esophageal cancer. The more a person drinks the greater the risk for head, neck, liver, breast, and colorectal cancer. Just as people could understand how inhaling smoke into their lungs could lead to the deadly lung cancer, it is common sense to understand how drinking can cause cancer in the organs that involve digestion.



The major medical news here is that for years moderate drinking was considered acceptable healthwise, and for red wine, even beneficial. 

People must have accurate up to date medical information of risks. A signficant number of people stopping or cutting down on alcohol consumption would be a hardship for grape growers, manufacturers, and retailers. The economy wouldn't crash but it would certainly be affected.

It is instructive to look at what happened when the surgeon general announced the danger of smoking and thereafter.



Excerpt:

Sixty years ago, about 70 million Americans smoked tobacco. An estimated 42 percent of adults identified themselves as smokers in 1965, and advertisements for cigarettes were impossible to avoid. Tobacco products were stylish and healthy, manufacturers insisted, with Camel claiming its cigarettes “don’t get your wind” and Old Gold saying its were “fresh as mountain air.”

So it came as a shock to the American public when, on January 11, 1964, their surgeon general appeared on television saying that smoking tobacco leads to disease and death.

Here's a photo from that article:

I have no idea if the surgeon general realized the coincidence of his releasing the report on this day.

For the alcohol habits of Americans to change and thus effect the economy it would take a huge cultural shift. This was written in 2014:

50 Years Later: A Closer Look at the Impacts of First Surgeon General's Report on Smoking

Excerpt:

"The surgeon general's report in 1964 was groundbreaking and led to an important cultural shift against smoking," said ACC President John Gordon Harold, MD, MACC. "Those important findings have been followed up by countless studies on the effects of smoking, which we now know are even worse than we thought. Physicians often discuss 'moderation' when helping patients change and maintain their health habits, but that is not the case with smoking. No amount of smoking is good and several studies have shown that even a small amount tobacco is very harmful. As a society we need to eliminate smoking from our culture. Heart disease is the leading cause of death in both men and women, and if almost half of those cases are from tobacco, then that is a serious problem."


(Personal Note: I feel lucky that my partner and I never developed even a taste for, let alone a need for, alcoholic beverages and we don''t drink. I'll have a small glass of champagne at a party to make a toast, but that's it.)

----------------------------------------

I post my blogs on Stressline.org where you can subscribe (for free everywhere) and on Substack where, if you want to submit your email, you can be notified of all new blog posts. I also post them on Medium because this enables them to be easily found on internet searches.

The halbrown.org platform includes a Disquis comment section. To use it you have to register on Disquis.



January 10, 2025

For MAGA oligarchs it's all about rubbing our noses in their billionaire power privilege, by Hal M. Brown

 


I'm not going to write about how Trump again proved he's above the law by getting barely a slap on the wrist in his sentencing this morning. Instead, I will focus on another wrist. This is the wrist of Mark Zuckerberg who, of course, is in the news having announced that he is ceasing to have fact checking on Facebook and Instagram.

Rather than that, I am going to write about this:

Zuckerberg wears $900,000 watch to announce end of Meta fact checks 






If Zuckerberg thought nobody would notice that he was wearing one of the most expensives watches anyone can buy, he's unbelievably naive about the way people scrutinize the internet. I think he absolutely knew what he was doing.

What we see with Trump and his billionare cronies is worse than an unabashed display of their wealth. There's a malevolence in what they do.

Ho-hum, we expect this of some of the super-wealthy. A goodly number of them were happy to show the public how rich they were in shows like Life Styles of the Rich And Famous. It ran for 11 years. They have pictorial articles about them in glossy magazines. The proletariat eats this crap up.

What the billionaire MAGA oligarchs are doing is rubbing the noses of their adversaries in their privilege. They enjoy knowing they can get away with just about anything. 

There's no "just about" with Trump. He thinks he can get away with absolutely anything. I doubt that the likes of Zuckerberg and Musk think that they could shoot somebody on Fifth Avenue and suffer no consequenses. They probably think the can do everything else, but probably not commit a cold blooded murder in plain sight. 

The only one of these billionaires who seemed to have gone a bit too far was Jeff Bezos. He got a lot of negative press when he nixed letting The Washington Post make an endorsement prior to the election. It is a telling observation about the times we live in that he got as much blowback later when he spiked the Ann Telnais editorial cartoon. Of course that cartoon expresses what I am writing about, i.e., that money can buy just about anything. Still, Bezos is not running for anything and he can easily afford to loose some Washington Post subscribers.

The Zuckerberg watch wearing story may seem like a small thing. However, since men, unless they're rappers, generally don't wear jewelry and thus can display their wealth by wearing an expensive necklace. Watches are the most visible way men can demonstrate their wealth by how they look.  

Women, oh say let's pick Melania Trump at random, have their own way of showing off privilege. See:


Perhaps Musk, who doesn't collect and wear expensive watches (as far as I know), is a tad bit more secure than Zuckerberg. Who the hell knows? Both seem to have been nerdy kids who may not have been popular. I'll put it simply saying that they may be playing their own script of "The Revenge of the Nerds." Since I am here today to bury these guys, not to psychoanalyze them, I'll refer you to the following which describes them as feeling like nerds when they were growing up:




These two proved to the world that their brains were more valuable in the long run than being a prom king. What both of them have in common with Trump that they like to rub our noses in their privilege. 

Update:


----------------------------------------

I post my blogs on Stressline.org where you can subscribe (for free everywhere) and on Substack where, if you want to submit your email, you can be notified of all new blog posts. I also post them on Medium because this enables them to be easily found on internet searches.

The halbrown.org platform includes a Disquis comment section. To use it you have to register on Disquis.







January 9, 2025

Forget the narcissism in malignant narcissism, Trump is just pure malignant, by Hal M. Brown

 

'Malignancy': Historian says 'everything just feels worse all the time' with Trump

 is the article in RawStory that prompted me to write, for the umpteenth time, about Trump being a malignant narcissist. I also posted a comment along with an AI picture of Trump looking at himself in a mirror.

Wikipedia gets everything right about malignant narcissism except the photo.

Narcissis wasn't the embodiment of evil even though narcissism was named for him. The entry is about malignant narcissism. A photo of Trump, who is a preening grandiose narcissist, should replace the painting of him. If you haven't googled Trump malignant narcissism you can click here.

There are two defintions of malignant. Many of us, myself included, are familiar with the feelings that come when you first hear a doctor utter that word about yourself or, in my case, a loved one. The other definition doesn't relate to death per se. The word is malevolent. The meaning is simple: having or showing a wish to do evil to others.

Trump fits the defintion of malignant narcissist. He could just as accurately be called a malevolent narcissist. I think it is a more fitting term since there's only one meaning of malevolent.

Trump would be evil even if he didn't have a grain of narcissism in his personality. His narcissism makes him more evil. This is because he exercises his evil impulses not merely because he gets a visceral satisfaction out of doing this, but because of his unrelenting need for attention and self-aggrandizement.

Erich Fromm, and a bit later Otto Kernberg, both greats in psychology, put psychopathy and narcissistic personality disorder together to describe a syndrome where someone experiences sadistic satisfaction in inflicting or having pain inflicted on others and is an extreme narcissist. 

This defines Trump and many of the people he has selected to work in his adminstration to turn the country into what shows all signs of becoming a ruthless dictatorship. 

Case in point:

'Shock and awe': What Trump 'border czar' Tom Homan has said he plans to do starting on Day 1


Last week, while appearing on Donald Trump Jr.'s podcast, the president-elect's son asked incoming "border czar" Tom Homan what border and immigration-related action the public can expect to see on Day 1 of the new Trump administration.

"Shock and awe," Homan responded. "Shock and awe," he repeated with a smile.

I think is is important to understand the meaning of the term "shock and awe."

Shock and awe (technically known as rapid dominance) is a military strategy based on the use of overwhelming power and spectacular displays of force to paralyze the enemy's perception of the battlefield and destroy their will to fight. Though the concept has a variety of historical precedents, the doctrine was explained by Harlan K. Ullmanand James P. Wade in 1996 and was developed specifically for application by the US military by the National Defense University of the United States. Wikipedia.

Note what I highlighted in the illustration in the Wikipedia article (click to enlarge)


All it will take will be for one overzealous Trump stormtrooper to decide to open fire on someone, or a group of people, for us to have a Kent State type massacre. It's also possible that someone about to be deported will use violence to resist and give the Trump stormtroops an excuse to respond with deadly force.

Is the country ready for pictures like this?

Unlike the photos from Kent State (above) they won't be still pictures. They will be live videos in full color because Trump, Homan, Stephen Miller, and others want as many people as possible to see their glorious shock and awe.

Is the country ready to see this? My fear is that half the country not only is ready, but they want it to happen because, for them, (as Adam Sewer titled his book) the cruelty is the point.

----------------------------------------

I post my blogs on Stressline.org where you can subscribe (for free everywhere) and on Substack where, if you want to submit your email, you can be notified of all new blog posts. I also post them on Medium because this enables them to be easily found on internet searches.

The halbrown.org platform includes a Disquis comment section. To use it you have to register on Disquis.




Portland threat is flower power: Time Magazine story photo shows just how dangerous Portland protestors are, by Hal M. Brown

    I hope someone who knows this so far unidentified woman sees the article and lets her know about it because, while not as classic as t...