December 18, 2024

Trump's soulless cruelty is the point and, appallingly, many Americans get off on it, by Hal M. Brown

 

D. Earl Stephens gets it right in his RawStory essay "Americans get off on hurt, cruelty and revenge — and soulless Trump is their hero." 


I read two articles is RawStory prior to deciding to write this. Before reading the essay by D. Earl Stephens (above) I read this:
Highlighted below is what struck me as revelatory:

"In the first term, everyone was fighting me. In this term, everybody wants to be my friend," Trump mused to reporters at his luxury Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida on Monday.

"I don't know, my personality changed or something."

What this sugests to me is that Trump is very much aware that his personality has been so noxious to many people that they just don't want to be physically near him. As I read these words I sense that he takes delight in this. 

This man is by any objective measure a malignant narcissist and someone who has all of the traits of a person described as being a manifestion of The Dark Triad. 

Here's a Wikipedia definition:

All three dark triad traits are conceptually distinct although empirical evidence shows them to be overlapping. They are associated with a callous–manipulative interpersonal style.


Not all of Trump's supporters fit neatly into the Dark Triad. In fact, the majority of them probably have some traits to an extent but not all three. They don't necessarily dominate their personalty and significantly influence their behavior. I view them as the type of people who enjoy watching people suffer at the hands of their heroes whether in political news or on TV shows and in movies.

What I find of grave concern is that, as Stephens put it, these people "get off on it." They react vicariously experiencing pleasure when they observe Trump use his Dark Triad "buff boxer muscles" to punch others in the face and even more so when he aims his blows below the belt. As unbelievable as it is to those of us living in the rational world they see Trump like I used AI to depict him in the images left and bottom left, not as he'd really look in the upper left, below:



When Trump is up, as he often is, at 2:00 posting vicious messages aimed at his enemies he knows that the audience that will be turned on by them. To use some words in Stephen's essay he does this both to hurt his enemies and to entertain his cult of warped, ghoulish, knuckle-draggers.

Related:




Previous list of  all blogs here.

Primary Hal Brown's Blog website is halbrown.org (if you are reading this anywhere else any additions or corrections will be at this address)



December 17, 2024

Trump is suing an Iowa paper and a polling company, what's next if polls show his approval ratings tanking? Will he sue the polls? By Hal M. Brown

 




This is from the Raw Story article above:

President-elect Donald Trump managed to cobble together a popular vote-winning coalition and he did so by making notable but modest gains with certain minority groups. 

But the problem for him, wrote Ronald Brownstein for CNN, is that he won the election with a group of voters who broadly don't like him, and may not even agree with some of his core policies like mass deportations. They simply took a chance on him over economic discontent, he wrote — and it won't take much for that to come crumbling down.

The portion that caught my attention is highlighted below:

"If Trump provides his most controversial nominees – such as Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to lead the Department of Health and Human Services and Kash Patel as director of the FBI – a 'blank check' to pursue polarizing agendas, [GOP pollster White] Ayres said, 'we are going to be looking at Joe Biden level-job approval numbers before we turn around' for Trump," Brownstein wrote.

 


If you follow the news (above, discussion about it is on MSNBC as I write this) you know about Trump suing the Des Moines Register and a polling company (here's a CNN article):

Here are excerpts:

There's a part of me that I don't really know what to make of when it comes to wishing the absolute worst for the country during the next four years so people who voted for Trump suffer.  In order for this to happen lots of good people will also suffer. In fact it is the good people will initially suffer more than the typical Trump voter. I don't want to see people suffer, not just know they are suffering, but literally see them suffering on television. But for the country to turn around this has to happen.

I offer for your consideration my Trump Tesla analogy.

I know that the people who thought Trump would usher in a a world of bluebirds and happiness for them personally are going to at some time be poleaxed with the realization that they bought the lemon of all lemon cars from a slick psychopathic salesman. The Trump car, let's say for obvious reasons that it is a Tesla, looked great in the showroom. Maybe they took it on a test drive and were impressed with the head snapping acceleration (one model will do 0-60 in less than two seconds and has a top speed of 200) and all electonic gewgaws. 

Perhaps in time these buyers will eventually discover the transmission had a nasty habit of freezing up. They might discover the hard way that there were faulty airbags, that the navigation system didn't know north from south, that the air conditioning is faulty, and there's a glitch in the automatic locking system that may engage trapping them inside. Back to the consequences of this at the end of the blog.

I concluded:

The pragmatic part of me knows that for the country to change and for compassionate democracy and a moral society to be embraced by enough voters to swing the next two elections to Democrats things have to go very very badly for those who voted for Trump. The Trump promised shiny new Trump Tesla has to be exposed as a junker. Things not only have to go so badly that the Democrats take control of Congress in two years and the presidency in four, but enough of the conservatives on the Supreme Court also must realize what evil they have enabled and the court has to take steps to put America back on course.

If enough voters realize they bought a slick looking junker named Trump they could vote Democratic in the next election and not only wrest control of Congress from Republicans but win in statewide elections. 

Trump wants to control the media. His rich friends are helping him. It wasn't just Jeff Bezos refusing to let The Washington Post publish an editorial endorsement for Harris prior to the election. For example, today we have the story of the Trump-supporting owner of the Los Angeles Times turning the paper into more of an outlet for Trump propaganda. Here's a report from another Trump propaganda paper, the New York Post, about this:

If people who voted for Trump because they were gullible and believed his lies, how will they learn that they are among many who are angry about this? Perhaps it will take talking to friends about increasing grocery prices or other effects they can see in their everyday lives. But if Trump has his druthers they won't find out about his growing unpopularity from the approval numbers provided by polling companies very possibly because every time they show his popularity dropping he will sue the companies. This will instill doubt in the veracity of the numbers. Obviously this would be Trump's intention.

He will use his usual technique of claiming the opposite of any inconvenient truth and saying his numbers are soaring and he is the most popular president in history. After all, he's managed to spread the word far and wide that he won a mandate in the election and thus is empowered to do anything he wants to do.

Consider: 

The first U.S. presidential poll to use modern statistical methods was a Gallup poll in 1936. But the first known presidential straw polls date to 1824—over a century before. 


These early straw polls were regional and informal. Newspapers reported the results as information about local opinions rather than possible predictions about how the national election might play out. Local straw polls continued throughout the 19th century. Then in 1916, The Literary Digest launched a national presidential poll. The magazine’s methods were flawed, but for five consecutive presidential races, the winner of The Literary Digest poll was also the winner of the actual election. 

This streak ended in 1936, when George Gallup predicted Franklin D. Roosevelt would win reelection and The Literary Digest said he wouldn’t. Gallup’s poll was a victory for statistical survey methods, and paved the way for modern presidential polling. From History.com

What would happen if Trump sued or threatened to sue every polling company and any media who published the results of the polls if they showed he was becoming unpopular. What if there were no more public opinion polls? The public would have no way of knowing about the national sentiment about what he was doing aside from talking to their friends unless there were street protests covered by the media. But then what if Trump sued companies that covered the protests? 

Going even further, perhaps coming from my own Trump hopefully not a derangement syndrome which I believe is based on a knowledge of history and my own rational fears, what if Trump declared a national emergency, outlawed protests, and called in the military to break protests up?

Going even further into Trump exercising dictatorial control and going full-on despot, what if an incident like the Kent State massacre happened and the regular media and social media couldn't publish photos like these?

The worst of the worst may not happen. It is possible that Trump's consuming need for revenge will lessen in time and his deep desire to be seen as both the most deeply loved and most horribly feared person in history will be satisfied.

I hope, if I live to see the day all of this plays out, and that I am not writing blogs saying "you were warned" but rather issuing a mea culpa.

Consider yesterday's blog with two Venn diagrams illustrating why I have such fear about what Trump may do to our democracy.

Click above to enlarge image. Click here to read blog.

If past is prologue, people who want unadulterated news about the coming Trump administration will probably have to listen to podcasts and watch independent political coverage on YouTube and read independent blogs on the internet.



Previous list of  all blogs here.

Primary Hal Brown's Blog website is halbrown.org (if you are reading this anywhere else any additions or corrections will be at this address)





 


December 16, 2024

Trumpian Venn diagram: life imitates dystopian art. By Hal M. Brown


I found the Venn diagram below in a Facebook post. Then I made a version with a DonkeyHotey caricature of Trump in the middle. I was planning to end the blog without making my own version but changed my mind and made one which you can see below.

Click above to enlarge.

I don't know who made the original with the names of movies and books. Some company made it into a sticker:

It has been republished in a number of places:



I wasn't familiar with Brazil. It is a 1985 dystopian science-fiction black comedy film directed by Terry Gilliam, focusing on a bureaucrat named Sam Lowry who dreams of escaping his oppressive reality. The film is known for its satirical take on bureaucracy and surveillance, drawing comparisons to George Orwell's "Nineteen Eighty-Four."

I'd heard of Gattaca but never saw it. It's a dystopian film set in a future society where people are genetically selected and then discriminated against based on their DNA.

Most people are familiar with the other flms and books shown.

You can use your imagination and judgment to add your segments. 

I had Tucker Carlson (who is said to be influencing Trump's choices). Some say Donald Trump Jr. exerts substantial influence over his father so I used him. 


Previous list of  all blogs here.

Primary Hal Brown's Blog website is halbrown.org (if you are reading this anywhere else any additions or corrections will be at this address)

Portland threat is flower power: Time Magazine story photo shows just how dangerous Portland protestors are, by Hal M. Brown

    I hope someone who knows this so far unidentified woman sees the article and lets her know about it because, while not as classic as t...