June 27, 2025

A new article and an old one about Trump's dangerous malignant narcissitic psychopathology prompted this Substack. By Hal M. Brown, MSW (Retired psychotherapist)

 




D. Earl Stephens1 wrote a piece in Raw Story+ (the subscription opinion section of the website) today and my comment, below, became my Substack for today. The title is Holy hell! I literally wrote the book on Trump but this has me stunned.Fortunately for those without a subscrption to RawStory+ the same article is on the author’s Substack, Enough Already, here with the title THE MORON - Our pathetic media has learned NOTHING the past decade while covering the stupidest, most dangerous man on the planet .

Stephens is the author of the Toxic Tales book shown below.

The only quibble I have with it is that the title in RawStory+ should read “a book” not “the book.” Except for the group of mental heath experts who contributed to “The Dangerous Case of Donald Trump” nobody can claim they wrote “the” book on Trump. “Dangerous Case” could be considered “the” book since it and a second edition with addtional articles were best sellers.

Below is my comment to the RawStory+ article, including the illustrations I used:

Even before you published your book (shown above), in 2017 John D. Gartner, the clincial psychologist who started the Duty to Warn group, published a book based on Trump's Tweets. Salon has an article about it here: What Donald Trump’s tweets reveal about his mental health.  

Trump told us who, and what he was before he was elected the first time. Psychologically he can be viewed as a malignant narcissist who has a sadistic streak as wide as the stripe down a skunk's back. People with this diagnosis depending on the position they hold can just be unpleasant to deal with or the more power they have the more dangerous they become. Since Trump has become the most powerful person in the world the book that laid this out from the point of view of therapists was "The Dangerous Case of Donald Trump" edited by psychiatrist Bandy Lee. Gartner authored one of the chaprters. See Wikipedia page.  

This is from Wikipedia: 

The authors argue that Trump's mental health affects the mental health of the people of the United States and that he places the country at grave risk of involving it in a war and of undermining democracy itself due to his dangerous pathology.  Consequently, the authors claim that Trump's presidency represents an emergency which not only allows but requires psychiatrists in the United States to raise alarms.

Since 2016 as much as eminent mental health professionals like Bandy Lee, James Gilligan, Lance Dodes, John Gartner, Justin Frank, Robert Jay Lifton, Phillip Zimbardo, David Reiss, Steven Buser and others, including not so eminent ones like myself, tried to warn about Trump’s dangerous psychopathology our warnings and reasoning was relegated to progressive venues and media outlets like Salon, The Atlantic, MSNBC , and Daily Kos where I used to post my stories. (I now post in Substack here) In fact, only John Gartner as far as I can tell made it into the mainstream media with an article published in USA Today in May 2017 Donald Trump's Malignant Narcissism is Toxic. (He used the word toxic in the title the way Stephens did in his later book.)  It is no solace that the predictions of so many have come true. We (I include myself because I have been one of the therapists writing about this since 2017) tried to warn people. It's possible this had an effect after his first term when he lost to Joe Biden. Obviously we failed in 2024. I venture to say that none of us are surprised at what Trump has done. The only surprise I think most of us would agree on is that he was able to do it this quickly.

Now I am fleshing out this Substack by referencing this article and the comments myself and others made to it.

For those who want to go into more depth about Trump and the role of mental health professionals read this article which was published in the website Mad in America in 2020: Muzzled by Psychiatry in a Time of Crisis The Man in the White Coat, The New York Times and The Stifling of the Public Debate about Donald Trump’s Fitness to Serve as President

I forgot about this article until today. Looking at it I was reminded that a comment I posted to it led to a long string of comments and replies. Many are from Steve McCrea, a mental health professional who has made nearly 10,000 comments to article on this website.

I first wrote the following:

Thank you for this behind the scenes account which explains a great deal. As one of the early members of John D. Gartner’s Duty to Warn group I am surprised it is the first that I learned of it. (A video of a Gartner speech was also presented as part of the Yale conference – you can read it here: https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2017/4/23/1655450/-Exclusive-Dr-John-Gartner-s-speech-to-Yale-Duty-to-Warn-Conference-on-Trump-s-mental-unfitness

Both the APA and Dr. Allen Frances did a lot of harm. The latter is the psychiatrist who says that because he wrote the DSM criteria for narcissistic personality disorder he is the only one qualified to say Trump doesn’t fit the definition because he doesn’t suffer or perceive any ill effects. (see https://www.theverge.com/2017/9/2/16239892/allen-frances-twilight-american-sanity-goldwater-rule-trump-personality-disorder).

Since 2016 as much as eminent mental health professionals like Bandy Lee, James Gilligan, Lance Dodes, John Gartner, Justin Frank, Robert Jay Lifton, Phillip Zimbardo, David Reiss, Steven Buser and others including not so eminent ones like myself, tried to warn about Trump’s dangerous psychopathology. Our reasoning was relegated to progressive venues and media outlets like Salon, The Atlantic, MSNBC , and Daily Kos where I post my stories. In fact, only John Gartner as far as I can tell made it into the mainstream media with articles published in USA Today.

We should take issue with the argument put forth by Allen Francis because it is a ludicrous one (people with NPD like those with anti-social personality, don’t usually suffer, they make other people suffer). The leaders of the American Psychiatric Associate and their adherence to the Goldwater rule as if it was superglued to the Hippocratic Oath really kept the responsible mental health community from getting the message out that Trump was dangerous, not only because he was an autocrat but also because he was a malignant narcissist with no conscience or empathy and is an exemplar for The Dark Triad, the deadly combination of extreme narcissism, sociopathy, and megalomania.

To find the comment thread my post led to scroll down the comment section until you see what I copied above. I won’t report all of them. They are long and detailed. I will just post my response to this one from Steve McCrea, another mental health professional:

Steve McCrea April 26, 2020 at 10:04 pm

I appreciate both your viewpoint and the civil tone of the discussion. I think the challenge that professionals (and I qualify as one) face here is that concern for safety of the nation can be very legitimate without invoking any kind of “mental illness” as a causal factor. There are plenty of people who are willing to kill other people who have no “mental illness” at all, even by DSM standards. They just think killing people is a good way to solve certain problems. They may even have their own internal “ethics” of when it is and isn’t OK to kill. In some cultures, it may even be required to kill someone if one’s honor is sufficiently undermined.

It is in my view utterly impossible to disentangle “personality disorders” from problems of ethics, morality, and social values. Until and unless there is an objective way to “diagnose” someone with a verifiable “mental illness,” we’re building castles in the air. I’d rather go back to philosophy and ethics to handle this kind of situation. Bringing in “mental illnesses” just adds confusion and controversy.

Here’s my reply:

Steve, I see you live in Portland too, but this is besides the point since what with Covid-19 it may be 1-2 years before we can even consider discussing our different opinions in person.

That being said I think whether done from a distance or not diagnosis has never been precise. When I started working the DSM was nothing more than a little booklet with pages held together by plastic clasps. The the pressure of insurance companies led to the requirement we diagnose. My psychoanalyst friends find making a diagnosis irrelevant for most of their patients. Who when push comes to shove would probably just say they were neurotic or in the most difficult clients perhaps borderline and if they needed a diagnosis would use the code we used in community mental health for years, 309.28.

I think the conceptualization of Trump as a malignant narcissist which was first offered by John Gartner is very useful. As I’m sure everyone reading this knows the personality type never made it into a DSM after it was described by Erich Fromm as a combination of NPD, sociopathic disorder, aggression, and sadism. He described it as a “severe mental sickness” representing “the quintessence of evil”. He characterized the condition as “the most severe pathology and the root of the most vicious destructiveness and inhumanity” (Wikipedia)

No less than the distinguished psychoanalyst Otto Kernberg built on Fromm’s conceptualization. Again from Wikipedia, he noted that “malignant narcissism includes a sadistic element creating, in essence, a sadistic psychopath. In his article, “malignant narcissism” and psychopathy are employed interchangeably. Kernberg first proposed malignant narcissism as a psychiatric diagnosis in 1984.”

Of course it never became a diagnostic category, but this doesn’t mean the combination of other disorders can’t exist in one person. Add to that the third element of what is called the Dark Triad along with sociopathy and extreme narcissism, megalomania, and the power of the president, and you have an incredibly dangerous psychopathology.

Who better to explain this to the public, and to members of Congress as Bandy Lee has to Democratic members, than mental health experts? Those who understand this have a moral and ethical responsibility to sound the alarm as Bandy Lee who doesn’t outright diagnose but still makes the case for Trump having a psychiatric assessment, and others like those in my first comment have been doing. Should we leave it up to lawyers like George Conway who wrote GEORGE CONWAY SAYS TRUMP IS A ‘MALIGNANT NARCISSIST’: HE’S ‘BOTH MENTALLY DISORDERED AND EVIL’ in Newsweek?

I don’t think so. If you had a client who told you their spouse or partner was abusing a child or threatening to harm someone it would be very clear that even without the legal backing of Tarasoff you would also have a duty to warn – a moral and ethical obligation to use what you know as a psychotherapist to protect someone in danger.

As the book title says, in the dangerous case of Donald Trump because of our being experts in assessing psychopathology in person and , when we have an incredible amount of data from observations, from afar we are the only people with the training and expertise to warn about the most dangerous person in America.

Steve took over replying to numerous comments before I posted my last one in response to Gracie:

Hal Brown,

From the daughter of a narcissist, and a close family member of a 2nd, but infinitely more abnormal and dangerous malignant narcissist, thank you for speaking out and thank you for this very sensible comment.

Those of us from around the world, as well as in the US, who have survived a malignant narcissist up close for years recognised Trump very quickly. Malignant narcissists can “ never be wrong” are hyper vigilant in their application of their psychopathy/sociopathy, devoid of empathy or conscience, delighting in sadistic pleasure, and absolutely are not just abusive, but dangerous, homicidally dangerous, deliberately dangerous.

To leave someone we recognise as an extreme example of this condition in a position of national, international, and most importantly, nuclear power is unconscionable.

To leave them in that position of power when they could be curbed or replaced with a person of the same political party is a dereliction.

To deliberately, consistently, attempt to stop people most qualified to speak on this type of person is unconscionable.

To go further to stop the media from talking about it is staggering and blatantly self-serving in some respect, whether in terms of power, political, or financially.

In years to come, IMHO, there will be a reckoning in the US, and many millions saying “why weren’t we told”.

This is what I wrote:

Gracie,

I am sorry you had these experiences and learned the hard way how toxic these people are.

In my 40 years of practice I saw many people, mostly women, who felt trapped in close relationships with extreme or malignant narcissists. If you do a web search for surviving living with a narcissist you will find numerous articles… 

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=how+to+survive+living+with+a+narcissist&t=h_&ia=web

If you search Amazon there are dozens of books with title like “Emotional and Narcissistic Abuse: The Complete Survival Guide to Understanding Narcissism, Escaping the Narcissist in a Toxic Relationship Forever, and Your Road to Recovery”

https://www.amazon.com/s?k=surviving+living+with+a+narcissist&ref=nb_sb_noss

Here’s a very brief therapy primer for treating victims of abusive relationship:

Once a trusting relationship is built, successful therapy with such people has several primary aspects. As therapists we help our clients build their self-esteem and gain insight as to what in their own personality keeps them in such a toxic relationship. But we also educate them as to why their abuser will never change no matter how many times they promise to do so. We essentially diagnose them from A DISTANCE as an extreme narcissist, sometimes combined with sociopaths, who are often master emotional manipulators. We sometimes recommend they read books on the subject.

Americans are married to Trump. Some married him the way women marry abusive men, falling in love with someone who manipulated them. Impeachment should have been a divorce. It didn’t work.

Congratulations to anyone who actually made it to the end of this lengthy Substack and who actually read every word. For thos who skimmed it I hope you got the idea. Put simply, mental health professionals were warning about Trump since 2017 and now everything they anticipated would happen, and worse, has be born out.

1

(D. Earl Stephens is the author of “Toxic Tales: A Caustic Collection of Donald J. Trump’s Very Important Letters”and finished up a 30-year career in journalism as the Managing Editor of Stars and Stripes. You can find all his work here.)

Thanks for reading my Substack! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and show that you support my work.

This post is public so feel free to share it.

Share

Leave a comment

Read previous Substacks.

Recent:

June 26, 2025

The mad scramble to gaslight us about what we saw with our own eyes after the Iran bombing. By Hal M. Brown Who you gonna believe, us truthsayers or the lying liars in the fake news?

 




In context below, here is the statement made by Pete Hegseth in his Pentagon press conference:

Let me read the bottom line here. President Trump directed the most complex and secretive military operation in history and it was a resounding success resulting in a cease fire agreement and the end of the 12-day war.

I have no doubt that Hegseth knows about D-Day and the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, but does he know what that planning for the first was called Operation Overlord and the second was called The Manhattan Project? I have my doubts.

Trump and Hegseth are desperate to brag about the success of the Iran bombing. Alas, for them, they don’t have compelling photographic evidence like those on the top of this page. All they have are a few photos like the ones below which were used to illustrate an article in The Economist which had a skeptical title:

All this leads me to ask if anyone in the room asked how they’d know if the bombing was successful. Ideally this is something the president would inquire about. Certainly a Secretary of Defense ought to have asked this.

I am sure all concerned in the effort wished that their bombs had caused the mountaintop to cave in producing a large crater. Unfortunately for them, all that it resulted in were small holes in the ground.

Still, Trump’s spin machine is spinning faster than a uranium centrifugeAs explained here, that’s damn fast and not easy to achieve:

Instead of enriching uranium, Trump’s centrifuge is spinning out wishful thinking and in one case the following outright lie.

Trump wants you to believe pieces of enriched uranium (called billets) are as big as Volkswagens, in fact hundreds of them could fit in a Volkswagen.

In fact, it is the centrifuges that would be difficult to move with short notice.

Top article and bottom article.

Hegseth, like his boss, thinks that blaming the press for instilling doubt about the success of the mission is the way to convince the public. For example this…

… and this:

Of course Hegseth is just marching like a Mini-me behind Trump who set a momumental example for bad manners at the NATO press conference where he insulted reporters directly. He even called for a CNN reporter to be fired and “thrown out like a dog.”

If, for whatever reason, the raid leads to a sustainable end to the conflict and an end to Iran’s nuclear bomb ambitions it can be touted as a successs. Hopefully this will be the final result.

However, Trump in his mania to brag about “obliterating” the deeply buried facility set himself up for what would be a humilating gotcha by Iran. If Iran did manage to remove all of their enriched uranium, I can imagine a scenario where they make a show of handing it over to third party nuclear inspectors as proof that they ended their bomb grade enrichment program. 

That would be rich….

Update: Read article.

Thanks for reading my Substack! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and show support for my work.

This post is public so feel free to share it.

Share

Leave a comment

Read all my Subsacks

Recent:

June 25, 2025

No Joy in Mudville: It looks like Trump's big beautiful bombs didn't achieve deep penetration, By Hal M. Brown Trump was Casey. He was at the bat. He had a big beautiful bat. He struck out.

 .

It depends on who you ask and who you want to believe. Either the US bombing of Iran’s nuclear sites obliterated them or, well, they didn’t. Below, the top stories from The NY Times (top) and The Washington Post (bottom) from yesterday are shown.

The Trump administration chose to use the word obliterate. They didn’t have to use this word. Now they have to live with it. For example, Trump posted on Truth Social on Sunday that "obliteration is an accurate term." Also:

Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt) said the following: “Everyone knows what happens when you drop fourteen 30,000-pound bombs perfectly on their targets: total obliteration.” Reference.

By now you’ve read about what bunker buster bombs are supposed to do, but to summarize in lay terms, they are designed to penetrate through levels of material from rock and dirt and then finally reach the reinforced concrete before the final bombs explode in one glorious burst which destroys the target. 

Reports suggest that Iran had been developing concrete technology which would be extremely difficult to breach. One could say somewhat like a medieval chastity belt (reference), only in this instance meant to keep the treasure of enriched uranium pure and untouched.

The mission is meant to be glorious for the bomber, obviously not for the bombed. If the deepest bomb goes off prematurely the ultimate goal is not achieved.

The thing is, with this bunker buster bomb attack, nobody on our side was able to discover whether the “hero’s” in the room were masters of their domain until much later. It seems to be common sense that the only way we could have learned this was for the mountain top to collapse in on itself leaving a deep visible crater. Instead all there were were photos of a few small holes in the ground.

In this instance, the only people who could assess the damage immediately were the Iranians and most likely the Russians.

A bunker busting bombing attack’s success is all about achieving deep penetration. No penetration, no satisfaction. It now appears that the mission was not accomplished. There’s no joy for the home team in our town. The crowd isn’t cheering. All there is is bombastic bluster using the word “obliterate” coming from the White House.

Here’s a baseball analogy. 

It’s the eighth inning and the score is 4-2 in a crucial game. The bases are loaded. The team we root for has their best hitter at bat. He swings at the first pitch and misses. Strike one. He swings at the second and misses. Strike two. The crowd holds their breath. He has one last chance for his bat to smack that ball out of the park. He swings. He misses. Strike three, he’s out. There’s no joy.

This is the story of Casey at the Bat. Here’s a synopsis from Wikipedia:

A baseball team from the fictional town of "Mudville" (the home team) is losing by two runsin its last inning. Both the team and its fans, a crowd of 5,000, believe that they can win if Casey, Mudville's star player, gets to bat. However, Casey is scheduled to be the fifth batter of the inning, and the first two batters (Cooney and Barrows) fail to get on base. The next two batters (Flynn and Jimmy Blake) are perceived to be weak hitters with little chance of reaching base to allow Casey a chance to bat.

Surprisingly, Flynn hits a single, and Blake follows with a double that allows Flynn to reach third base. Both runners are now in scoring position and Casey represents the potential winning run. Casey is so sure of his abilities that he does not swing at the first two pitches, both called strikes. On the last pitch, the overconfident Casey strikes out swinging, ending the game and sending the crowd home unhappy.

Many of you read the poem as children. It’s worth it to reread it since there is so much analogous to the bunker busting attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities. For one thing, each sotry has a hero their team counts on. They both happen to wear hats as part of their work uniform.

Here’s the poem:

The outlook wasn’t brilliant for the Mudville nine that day;

The score stood four to two with but one inning more to play.

And then when Cooney died at first, and Barrows did the same,

A sickly silence fell upon the patrons of the game.

A straggling few got up to go in deep despair. The rest

Clung to that hope which springs eternal in the human breast;

They thought if only Casey could but get a whack at that—

We’d put up even money now with Casey at the bat.

But Flynn preceded Casey, as did also Jimmy Blake,

And the former was a lulu and the latter was a cake;

So upon that stricken multitude grim melancholy sat,

For there seemed but little chance of Casey’s getting to the bat.

But Flynn let drive a single, to the wonderment of all,

And Blake, the much despised, tore the cover off the ball;

And when the dust had lifted, and men saw what had occurred,

There was Jimmy safe at second and Flynn a-hugging third.

Then from 5,000 throats and more there rose a lusty yell;

It rumbled through the valley, it rattled in the dell;

It knocked upon the mountain and recoiled upon the flat,

For Casey, mighty Casey, was advancing to the bat.

There was ease in Casey’s manner as he stepped into his place;

There was pride in Casey’s bearing and a smile on Casey’s face.

And when, responding to the cheers, he lightly doffed his hat,

No stranger in the crowd could doubt ’twas Casey at the bat.

Ten thousand eyes were on him as he rubbed his hands with dirt;

Five thousand tongues applauded when he wiped them on his shirt.

Then while the writhing pitcher ground the ball into his hip,

Defiance gleamed in Casey’s eye, a sneer curled Casey’s lip.

And now the leather-covered sphere came hurtling through the air,

And Casey stood a-watching it in haughty grandeur there.

Close by the sturdy batsman the ball unheeded sped—

“That ain’t my style,” said Casey. “Strike one,” the umpire said.

From the benches, black with people, there went up a muffled roar,

Like the beating of the storm-waves on a stern and distant shore.

“Kill him! Kill the umpire!” shouted some one on the stand;

And it’s likely they’d have killed him had not Casey raised his hand.

With a smile of Christian charity great Casey’s visage shone;

He stilled the rising tumult; he bade the game go on;

He signaled to the pitcher, and once more the spheroid flew;

But Casey still ignored it, and the umpire said, “Strike two.”

“Fraud!” cried the maddened thousands, and echo answered fraud;

But one scornful look from Casey and the audience was awed.

They saw his face grow stern and cold, they saw his muscles strain,

And they knew that Casey wouldn’t let that ball go by again.

The sneer is gone from Casey’s lip, his teeth are clinched in hate;

He pounds with cruel violence his bat upon the plate.

And now the pitcher holds the ball, and now he lets it go,

And now the air is shattered by the force of Casey’s blow.

Oh, somewhere in this favored land the sun is shining bright;

The band is playing somewhere, and somewhere hearts are light,

And somewhere men are laughing, and somewhere children shout;

But there is no joy in Mudville—mighty Casey has struck out.

Casey At The Bat, by ERNEST LAWRENCE THAYER A Ballad of the Republic, Sung in the Year 1888

Thanks for reading my Substack! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.

This post is public so feel free to share it.

Share

Leave a comment

Read all my Substacks.

Recent:

What's not being asked about why Turmp wanted a brain scan?

  RawStory (click images above for links) summarizes the portion of the Washingon Post article (subscription, about what happened after Trum...