Showing posts with label Sabrina Haake. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sabrina Haake. Show all posts

September 18, 2025

Kimmel may have gotten fired for a telling a joke about Trump, ABC should now stand for Always Bow and Cower.



Most people have heard of the stages of grief even if they aren’t familiar with Elisabeth Kübler-Ross (article). Jimmy Kimmel certainly knows about it because he referenced it in his monologue. Playing psychologist, he altered the fourth stage just for Trump and showed how quickly he moved to the final stage of acceptance.

If you haven’t seen or read the portions of the Jimmy Kimmel monologue that led to him being fired click 1 here 1

Sabrina Haake has a great first sentence in her Substack “Jimmy Kimmel has a First Amendment claim against Trump's FCC. (here)” It is “If Trump’s skin gets any thinner the US will have its first translucent president.” 

She goes on to say:

Trump, who relishes belittling people with unpresidential insults, like calling democrats ‘scum’ and ‘the enemy within,’ can’t take it when his slurs boomerang back at him.

Instead of accepting that jokes, jabs and insults come with the territory—satirizing presidents is an American tradition— Trump reacts like an enraged teenager when anyone insults him. Whenever the media fail to fawn, or worse, accurately report Trump’s unprecedented corruption or ineptitude, his first instinct is to use federal resources to seek retribution against them.

She then goes on to focus both on legal issues (she’s an attorney) and Trump’s psychology which covers much of what I planned to write about this morning.

My premise is that the real “crime” that led to Kimmel’s dismissal wasn’t what he said about Charlie Kirk. It is what he said about Trump. I am not alone in this. Others commenting on the firing have been expressing this opinion.

We’ll never know whether Trump himself pushed hard to have him fired. It may not matter since ABC knew how he felt about Kimmel and what would make him happy. 

When it comes to Trump unless they keep Kimmel’s show the letters ABC forever will mean Always Bow and Cower.

Unless he’s really thick Trump had to know he waded into the shit when he saw the monologue. If he realized this he’d have been triggered when Kimmel talked about the fourth stage of grief after he played the clip of his bragging about his glorious ballroom. This is where he plans to have Trumpian Big Balls which he can show off to prove how great he is - make of that what you will.

He may have thought “enough is enough” and picked up the phone and called Bob Iger and told him to get rid of that Kimmel guy.

Trump set himself up. Not being the most self-aware person in the room he may not have realized that he made himself the butt of the joke with his own words. We know he boycotts that White House Correspondents Dinner because he had to sit through being mocked there by Barack Obama (see article which has a video). 

Trump made himself the butt of Obama’s jokes by promoting the Obama birth certificate conspiracy (see Wikipedia).

That took some thought and planning. He spontaneously made himself the butt of Kimmel’s joke just by being himself.

In fact, in some ways Trump is the most unfunny joke in American history but if he wasn’t about to destroy democracy we would find his antics hilarious. Now when we hear well crafted jokes about him the saying “that’s so funny it hurts to laugh” applies.

Still, whenever possible those with a platform must keep mocking him. 

Thanks for reading Hal Brown's Substack! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.

Share Hal Brown's Substack

Leave a comment

Previous Substacks

My comments in RawStory

1

What Jimmy Kimmel said about Charlie Kirk

"We hit some new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it. In between the finger-pointing, there was, uh, grieving on Friday − the White House flew the flags at half-staff, which got some criticism, but on a human level, you can see how hard the president is taking this.

Then he showed the clip of what the president said after a reporter asked him how he was holding up after the death of his friend Charlie Kirk and Trump said “I think very good” before going on to brag about the new White House ballroom he was having built:

“And by the way, right there you see all the trucks. They just started construction of the new ballroom for the White House, which is something they’ve been trying to get for about 150 years. And it’s gonna be a beauty. It’ll be an absolutely magnificent structure.”

The this is what Kimmel said:

Yes, he's at the fourth stage of grief: construction. Demolition, construction. This is not how an adult grieves the murder of someone he called a friend; this is how a four-year-old mourns a goldfish, OK? And it didn't just happen once. And then we installed the most beautiful chandelier. Responses you wouldn't believe. Who thinks like that, and why are we building a $200 million chandlier in the White House? Is it possible that he's doing it intentionally so he can be bad about that instead of the (Jeffrey) Epstein list? …

There was more:

“And it didn’t just happen once,” Kimmel continued, throwing to a clip from Fox and Friends, where the President again responded to a question about Kirk’s death by talking about his ballroom.

“Oh, when I heard it? I was in the midst of building a great… for 150 years they’ve wanted a ballroom at the White House, right?” Trump said before going on to reveal that the architects informed him of Kirk’s shooting.

“There’s something wrong with him, there really is,” Kimmel stated. “I mean, who thinks like that?”

More importantly, the late-night host questioned, “Why are we building a $200 million ballroom in the White House? Is it possible that he’s doing it intentionally so we can be mad about that instead of the Epstein list?”

TV Insider has an article about this which incudes his entire 16 minute monologue.

September 3, 2025

Thinking The Unthinkable, By Hal M. Brown

Tue, Aug 26 at 5:23 AM


 

I was going to write a Substack about this before I read my friend Sabrina Haake’s Substack this morning. Then I read her Substack and realized how what I was thinking fit in with what she was saying in her Haake Take titled “Blue states: Stop funding Trump's Confederacy.” It is subtitled “Previously held assumptions about federalism, including taxation, are falling.” I noticed that the illustration she used was Archibald Willard’s “Yankee Doodle” which is also known as “The Spirit of ‘76.”

I wondered why she used this painting rather than an illustration of a Civl War battle like one of these:

Still, even though she wrote about a peaceful civil war the picture is of a battlefield and you can clearly see, in addtion to the drummers and fife player a wounded soldier and a Union soldier raising his hat in victory.

This is her concluding paragraph:

A new kind of civil war is here, but Democrats did not invite it. When our backs are against the wall, facing the firing squad of a rogue president, complicit party, and corrupt high court determined to destroy us, we must act in our own self-interest. Freedom and our nation’s survival depend on it.

I agree completely with what Sabrina is saying about blue states hitting the Trump Confederacy in the wallet.

My focus is on the development we hope never comes to pass. This would be an actual armed confrontation between the New Union and the New Confederacy.

The Oregon Army National Guard consists of 41 armories in 33 communities. (Read about it in Wikipedia.)

Because we drove by one of their amories yesterday and Ann managed to take some decent photos last night I thought I’d use them as part of my Wednesday Substack.

Click above to enlarge.

There are a few scenarios which could develop where blue states would end up mobilizing their National Guards to protect themselves. Much would depend on the legal cover given if the Supreme Court came to its senses and ruled that Trump had violated the Posse Comitatus Act in sending troops to LA and DC. This could come to a head if he does this in Chicago as he has threatend to do.

If Trump defied such a ruling (Sabrina may want to weigh in on this since she’s a lawyer) and tried to take over normal law enforcement functions could the state governors order the National Guard to stop them from doing this? I seems to this non-lawyer that it is possible.

If Trump wanted his own soldiers to enforce his will, it could pit members of the Oregon National Guard against members of the Idaho National Guard (Wiki) or against members of active duty military.

I find it beyond the pale to imagine another actual replay of the Civil War with Americans shooting Americans. I could, however, see some extremely tense face-offs which resulted in a trigger happy soldier shooting someone.


Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.

This post is public so feel free to share it.

Share

Leave a comment

Previous Substacks

August 13, 2025

Cataclysmic betrayal of Ukraine in the offing. By Hal M. Brown

 


First, some history thanks to Sabrina Haake’s Substack today: 

What the US owes Ukraine and why

Trump is about to get played again by a notorious war criminal, on American soil, without understanding why the US helps Ukraine at all

Now to Trump biographer Michael Wolff’s opinion about what Trump is attempting to do in his meeting with Putin. Wolfe see it as an attempt to distract from the Epstein story. It is described in the RawStory article 'I need a big thing!' Trump said to be considering major betrayal as Epstein distraction.

Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.

He saw the first part of what I call his “don’t look here, look here instead” plan as the takeover of Washington , DC. Part two is an even more hideous part. This is the betrayal of Ukraine. 

Here’s an excerpt from the RawStory article:

“That is what he got to,” Wolff said. “‘I’m going to have to do Ukraine.’”

Wolff claims the president will pull the U.S. out of any involvement in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, which Trump believes will appease the isolationist MAGA base, after he meets with Russian President Vladimir Putin this week in Alaska.

“He’s going to sacrifice Ukraine for Epstein,” Wolff said. “Essentially, this is, in his mind, a trade. It is the MAGA people who have pressed this Epstein issue constantly. I mean, they’re the threat.”

White House staffers were caught off guard by Trump resuming his direct involvement in reaching a settlement in the conflict, and they aren't sure what he will do, but Wolff said “nobody in the White House can see this turning out so well for Ukraine."

Could it be that there is something so potentially damaging in the Epstein saga that he fears it could actually become a Nixonian level gate? Wolfe apparently thinks it might. Consider:

But the author ultimately thinks this distraction will fail to silence questions about Epstein, who described himself in an interview with Wolff as Trump's "closest friend."

“The Epstein drumbeat is real,” Wolff said. “It is unceasing and it is threatening, most of all, to Donald Trump.”

How bad could a highly credible revelation be about Trump’s involvement in a sex with minors ring be to unnerve him? This is the serial sex abusuer who survived the Pee Tapes and the E. Jean Carroll case. 

If this goes beyond what Trump knew about to what Trump actually did would this merely be dismissed as “fake news” by MAGA? After all, this is a group which accepted Pizzagate as real.

If they accepted this as real there’s no reason that they wouldn’t believe that even with photographic evidence they’d believe Trump either didn’t do it, or if he did, there was nothing wrong with it. In addition, what with the ability to use AI to make deep fake images, they could just say that this is what these were.

In fact, if Putin does have actual pee tapes which he’s been using as blackmail, there’s a ready made way to debunk them.

In MAGA world, nothing is real unless Trump says it’s real. Conversely, if Trump says something is fake, it has to be fake.

Meanwhile let’s see how much blood Trump will have on his hands if, as expected, he sells out Ukraine.

Thanks for reading my Substack! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.

This post is public so feel free to share it.

Share

Leave a comment


June 10, 2025

While anxiously waiting for Trump's next move on his dictatorial juggernaut I found two small things to be pleased about. By Hal M. Brown

 

..

I was looking at my friend Sabrina Haake’s Facebook page.  She writes the Substack The Haake Take.

This is what I saw:

I wrote the following comment:

Last night watching Stephanie Ruhle's MSNBC show with her talking to Jon Meacham about LA and Trump, and at the end of a long segment she (I'm paraphrasing) said we should get alarmed yet and he (again parphrasing) said it is acceptable to be alarmed. On Lawrence O'Donnell's long first segment about this, I was pleased that for the entire time he had this photo on the screen. Trump is known to watch the show and I suspect this was done just to piss him off. I'd seen the photo on the lower left but not this one. (click image to enlarge) I still haven't decided what to write my Substack about - this is hardly a big story but I am tempted to share it if I can't think of something else. Here's an article about the tripping video going viral. (The photo I posted with my comment is on the top of this page.)

I wonder whether there was any debate among staff at Lawrence’s show about which photo to feature. The photo of Trump’s face is one of the least flattering I’ve seen recently, but the one from the back shows how badly he tripped. Lawrence showed a video of Trump walking up the stairs to Air Force One and said that this was the video Trump did not want you to see.

Back to Jon Meacham and what he said to Stephanie Rhule.

I’ve referred to the impact Walker Chronkite had on LBJ and the country when he editorialized about the Vietnam War and how this is considered by historians to have been a seminal event leading to the United State’s withdrawing from Vietnam.

Excerpt:

It may be hard to believe in the current era of declining media credibility and amid President Donald Trump's bitter condemnations of "fake news," but mainstream journalists once were trusted figures in society who could sway public opinion in a major way.

A historic example occurred 50 years ago this week: the stunning commentary of CBS anchor Walker Cronkite on Feb. 27, 1968, in which he dissected the U.S. role in Vietnam, stepped away from objectivity, and came to a very negative conclusion. He crystallized public opposition to the Vietnam War and dealt a setback to the credibility of the U.S. government.

Today we don’t have any one person with the influence and credibility of Walter Chronicle. If I could chose one it just might be Jon Meacham.

Of course, back in the Chronkite days we didn’t have cable news. There were three networks. Of the three networks, CBS, NBC, and ABC, in the 1960s and 70s, CBS News was widely considered to be the best in the business (reference).

For those too young to remember here’s an article:

Note that the above article is from CNN and entrepreneur and philanthropist Ted Turner (who was married to Jane Fonda for 10 years) didn’t launch the first 24 hour news network until 1980.

With all the horrible news at least I was pleased to see how Lawrence O’Donnell may have sent a message to Trump that would piss him off, and I was glad that Jon Meacham gave permission, of a sort, to Stephanie Ruhle and her audience not only to be alarmed, but basically said that they should be alarmed.

Thanks for reading my Substack! Subscribe for free to receive new posts.

This post is public so feel free to share it.

Share

Leave a comment

Read all my Substacks.

Most recent (click to enlarge image):

Recommended reading:

My early nomination for the Time Person of the Year and the Nobel Peace Prize

Time Magazine’s Person of the Year, and the even more lofty Nobel Peace Prize, are the most prestigious and coveted awards that recognize...